As pointed out in this review of the role of microorganism to mitigate abiotic plant stresses, their use can open new and emerging applications in agriculture and also provide excellent models for understanding stress tolerance, potentially to be engineered into crop plants to cope with abiotic stresses such as soil salinity.In another study by Marks et al.it was demonstrated that dramatic changes in salinity of salt marsh soils as caused by storm surges or freshwater diversions can greatly affect denitrification rates, which is especially relevant for nutrient removal management of eutrophic waters such as for the Mississippi delta.Rath et al.studied such dynamic conditions by the bacterial response to drying-rewetting in saline soils and concluded that increased soil salinity prolonged the time required by soil microbes to recover from drought, both in terms of their growth and respiration.Biochar is defined as organic matter that is carbonized by heating in an oxygen-limited environment.The properties of biochar vary widely, dependent on the feed stock and the conditions of production.Biochar is relatively resistant to decomposition compared with fresh organic matter or compost, and thus represents a long-term carbon store.Biochar stability is estimated to range from decades to thousands of years,ebb flow but its stability decreases as ambient temperature increases.It has been shown that application of biochar to soil can improve soil chemical, physical and biological attributes, enhancing productivity and resilience to climate change, while also delivering climate-change mitigation through carbon sequestration and reduction in GHG emissions.
Chaganti et al.evaluated the potential of using biochar to remediate saline–sodic soils in combination with various other organic amendments using reclaimed water with moderate SAR.Results showed that leaching with moderate SAR water was effective in reducing the soil salinity and sodicity of all investigated soils, irrespective of amendment application.However, it was shown that combined applications of gypsum with organic amendments were more effective to remediate saline–sodic soils, and therefore could have a supplementary benefit of accelerating the reclamation process.Akhtar et al.used a greenhouse experiment to show that biochar amendment for a different soil salinity levels could alleviate the negative impacts of salt stress in a wheat crop through reduced plant sodium uptake due to its high adsorption capacity, decreasing osmotic stress by enhancing soil moisture content, and by releasing mineral nutrients into the soil solution.However, it was recommended that more detailed field studies must be conducted to evaluate the long-term residual effects of biochar.The application of marginal waters to augment irrigation water supplies particularly has led to investigations to evaluate plant nutrient uptake impact of saline-sodic soils.It has been shown that soil salinity can induce elemental nutrient deficiencies or imbalances in plants depending on ionic composition of the soil solution, due their effect on nutrient availability, competitive uptake, transport, and partitioning within the plant.Most obviously, soil salinity affects nutrient ion activities and produces extreme ion ratios in soil solution.
As a result, for example, excess Na+ can cause sodium-induced Ca2+ or K+ deficiency in many crops.Nutrient uptake and accumulation by plants is often reduced under saline soil conditions because of competition between the nutrient in question and other major salt species, such as by sodium-induced potassium deficiency in sodic soils.Soil salinity is expected to interact with nitrogen both as competition between NO 3 and Cl ions in uptake processes as high chloride concentrations may reduce nitrate uptake and plant development , and indirectly through disruptions of symbiotic N2 fixation systems.Interactions with phosphorus vary with plant genotype and external salinity and P concentrations in soil solution, which are highly dependent on soil surface properties.Calcium magnesium and sulfur as well as micro-nutrients all interact with soil salinity, Na and one another.Imbalance of these elements cause various pathologies in plants including susceptibility to biotic stresses.Among potential alternative land uses of saline soils is their economic potential for biomass production using forestry plantations , as many tree species are less susceptible to soil salinity and sodicity than agricultural crops.A thorough review of the economic potential of bioenergy from salt-affected soils has been presented by Wicke et al..Using the FAO soil salinity database, they estimated that the global economic potential of biosaline forestry is about 53 EJy 1 , when including agricultural land, and to 39 EJ y 1 when excluding agricultural land.
Plantation forestry has been advocated to control dryland salinity conditions, with fast growing versatile Eucalyptus species to lower shallow groundwater tables, however, salinity/sodic stresses in the long-term prohibit significant economic returns.Much will depend on regional production costs.Studies have shown that biosaline forestry may contribute significantly to energy supply in certain regions, such as sub-Saharan Africaand South Asia, and has additional benefits of improving soil quality and soil carbon sequestration , thus justifying investigating biosaline forestry in the near future.Economic losses of productive land by salinization are difficult to assess, however, various evaluations have reported annual costs of US $250–500/ha , suggesting a total annual economic loss of US$30 billion globally.As pointed out by Qadir et al., a large fraction of salt-affected land is farmed by smallholder farmers in Asia and SSA, necessitating off-farm supplemental income activities, with others leaving their land for work in cities.Given that much of the projected global population growth is in those regions, prioritization of research and infrastructure investments to mitigate agricultural production impacts there is extremely relevant.A thorough analysis of the production losses and costs of salt-induced land degradation was done by Qadir et al., based on crop yield losses, however, they point to the need to also consider additional losses such as by unemployment, health effects, infrastructure deterioration, and environmental costs.Their calculations compared economic benefits using cost-benefit analysis of “no action” vs “action” for various case studies.A yield gap analysis by Orton et al.for wheat production in Australia showed that soil sodicity alone represented 8% of the total wheat yield gap, representing more than AUS $1 billion.In their sustainability assessment of the expanding irrigation in the western US, comparing real outcomes with those predicted by Reisnerin this book Cadillac Desert, Sabo et al.included an economic analysis of agricultural revenue losses as a result of the increased soil salinity for the western US.Using the USDA NRCS soil’s data base, and available crop salt tolerance information,greenhouse benches they estimated a total annual revenue loss by reduced crop yields of 2.8 billion US dollars.In all, land values of salinized lands depreciate significantly and incur huge economic impact, putting into question the sustainability of agricultural land practices that induce soil salinization.Australia is the world’s driest inhabited continent with an average annual rainfall of 420 mm with a high potential for the formation of salt-affected landscapes.Development of agricultural practices in Australia began after the European settlement and was widely adopted during 20th century.Earlier, the indigenous population found their food by hunting and foraging.They indirectly depended on soils for plant food, but they did so without soil management.The European settlers were unaware of the soil characteristics they had to work with.Salt has been accumulating in the Australian landscape over thousands of years through small quantities blown in from the ocean by wind and rain.In addition to mineral weathering, salt accumulation is also associated with parna, a wind-blown dust coming from the west and the south-west of the continent.
Many soils of the arid to sub-humid regions of Australia contain significant amounts of water-soluble salts, dominantly as sodium chloride.Their dense sub-soils are frequently characterized by moderate to high amounts of exchangeable sodium and magnesium , and are generally named duplex soils.Discussing the genesis and distributions of saline and sodic soils in Australia, Isbell et al.concluded that salts from a variety of sources have probably contributed to the present saline and sodic soils.In the early part of 20th century, the Australian government initiated a nation-wide soil survey with soil analysis.As early as the 1930s, soil surveys in the Salmon Gums district, Western Australia, found that salt accumulation in surface and subsoils occurred in more than 50% of the 0.25 million ha surveyed.These surveys also found that virgin areas had higher accumulations of salts in the upper meter than in vegetation-cleared areas for the major soil types.In one of his earlier observations in the Mallee region of Southern Australia, Holmes found a salt bulge that was more than 4 m below the surface in a virgin heath community.Northcote and Skene , examining numerous data relating to the morphology, salinity, alkalinity, and sodicity of Australian soils presented the areal distribution of saline and sodic soils in Australia, using the classification of salt-affected soils of Table 2.While 32.9% of the total area in Australia is salt-affected, sodic soils occupy 27.6% of this area.Hence, most of the research during the middle of the 20th century focused on sodic soils and their management.Northcote and Skene defined sodic soils as those having an ESP between 6 and 14, and strongly sodic soils as those having an ESP of 15 or more.The recent Australian soil classification defined “Sodosols”as soils with an ESP greater than 6.However, soils with ESP 25–30 were excluded from sodosols, because of their very different land-use properties.California’s natural geology, hydrology and geography create different forms of salinity problems across the state, ranging from sea water intrusion induced salinity along the central coast to concentration of salts in closed basins such as the Tulare Lake basin in the Central Valley.In addition, some of the most productive soils in California such as in the western San Joaquin Valley originate from ocean sediments that are naturally high in salts.Irrigation water dissolves that salt and moves it downstream or it isThe salinity in the Colorado river used for irrigation in the Imperial Valley is higher than that of surface water from the snow melt.Although salinity problems can be found in various locations around California as shown in Fig.22, historically the major salinity issues are found in the Western San Joaquin Valley and the Imperial Valley.A thorough review of the history of irrigation in California was presented by Oster and Wichelns.Today, California’s interconnected water system irrigates over 3.4 Mha of farmland.The Imperial Valley in southern California has experienced salinity problems for many decades, since the Colorado river was tapped for irrigation in the early 1900s.By 1918 salinity had forced approximately 20,234 ha out of production and damaged thousands more hectares.The rapidly deteriorating agricultural lands from salinization forced the Imperial irrigation District to construct open ditch drainage channels.However, due to high salinity in the Colorado river water, heavy soils and poor on-farm water management at the time, the drainage system did not prevent continued salinization of the Imperial Valley.To address the problem, partnerships between the federal government, and the Imperial irrigation district were formed in the early 1940s that resulted in installation of underground concrete and tile drainage on thousands of hectares of farms.The subsurface drainage system and improved on-farm water management led to a reduction in the rate of soil salinization, resulting in flourishing agricultural production in the Imperial Valley.The water from the subsurface drainage tiles was routed to the Salton Sea.However, agricultural runoff and drainage flows with high salt content have affected the elevation of Salton Sea and increased its salinity threatening various wildlife species.On the positive side, the salinity load coming into the Imperial Valley as measured by salinity levels at the Imperial dam have not increased as previously projected.A report from the US Bureau of Reclamation reported a flow weighted salinity of 680 mg/L in 2011 at the imperial dam and had remained constant for past decades.Another major region in California significantly impacted by salinity is the western San Joaquin Valley , comprising the southern half of the Central Valley.From the second half of the 19th century to the early 1900s the SJV experienced rapid development of irrigated agriculture, along with it came drainage and salinity problems.The salinity problems on the West side of the valley can be attributed to high water tables near the valley trough caused by an expansion of irrigated agriculture upslope from the valley,soils on the West side are derived from alluvium originating from coastal mountains and other marine environments, and degradation of water quality in the San Joaquin river.In 1951, some of the fresh water in the San Joaquin river was diverted to irrigate agricultural lands on the east side north of Friant dam.The diverted water was replaced with saltier water from the Central Valley project.These changes coupled with agricultural return flows led to increased salinity downstream of the San Joaquin river, the main conduit draining the valley.