In separate studies NPR1 over-expression and enhanced resistance are correlated either with elevated or earlier expression of PR gene transcripts, thus supporting this theory . Along with stimulating PR gene expression and priming plants to respond to infection, high NPR1 expression levels enhance the sensitivity of plants to chemicals and fungicides including BTH, fosetyl, and Cu2 . NPR1 is also required for a BTH-induced defense priming indicating a great potential for coupling both chemical and transgenic disease strategies through plants expressing NPR1 . For instance, plants can be engineered to over-express NPR1 so that a lower chemical dose is required to confer efficient disease resistance. Genes with high sequence similarity to NPR1 can be found in Arabidopsis, tobacco, tomato, rice and maize suggesting that this regulator will be conserved among many plant species. Over expression of NPR1 in rice has been shown to enhance resistance to the rice bacterial blight pathogen Xoo . Studies with a putative rice homolog of NPR1 indicate that over-expression of the endogenous rice gene can also provide protection against Xoo . However, unlike in Arabidopsis, rice over-expressing NPR1 grown under sub-optimal conditions display a detrimental growth phenotype. These types of observations may predict an overall phenotype that will need to be further investigated when strongly over-enhancing SAR pathway components in plants . Together these data suggest that, in general,growing vegetables in vertical pvc pipe crop plants contain defense signaling components similar to those found in Arabidopsis.
Potentially, over-expression of other endogenous signaling components other than NPR1 may also be able to provide enhanced plant protection.Biotic infections that stimulate localized host cell death can stimulate SAR in a wide variety of plants, as indicated above. Similarly, root colonization by non-pathogenic Rhizobacteria, can stimulate induced systemic resistance . This resistance is distinct from SAR, but interestingly shares one of the same components, NPR1and can work additively with SAR to mount a heightened defense response . Induction of the ISR response requires that plants are able to properly respond to signals triggered by JA and by the plant hormone ethylene. ISR is not functional in Arabidopsis mutants that are nonresponsive to ethylene, although the SAR response remains intact . Presently, most work utilizing ISR with field grown crops focuses on bio-control. For example, when tomato plants or seeds are treated with dried Rhizobacteria spores, the severity of infection by the tomato mottle virus is reduced . It is notable that the ISR pathway shares components with other defense pathways. Thus, altering the amount of a single component involved in multiple pathways, such as NPR1, may have unintended pleiotropic effects, both favorable and unfavorable that will need to be addressed before application in the field. Plants induce defense responses not only against bacterial, fungal and viral pathogens but also against pests that can cause wounding. Thus, other biotic inducers of resistance include herbivorous insects. The chemical JA is important for triggering resistance to these pests . The defense pathways controlling insect defense and other induced responses are partially antagonistic.
Treatment of plants with SA and BTH can inhibit the induction of JA induced genes and conversely, application of JA reduces the defenses triggered by ISR inducers . However, it appears that the SA and JA pathways can also, in some situations, act in concert to promote defenses against at least a subset of pathogens. In Arabidopsis, in studies where both SA and JA are applied to a plant these chemicals can work additively to protect plants against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato . Potentially, upregulation of one induced resistance pathway may impart costs to a number of other pathways. With such complexity inherent in defense responses, it becomes clear that thorough field tests performed under multiple environmental, developmental and pathogen stressors will be essential for any plants engineered for enhanced resistance.Basic research is providing an ever-expanding arsenal of genes with which to engineer disease resistance. Several of these genes have already proven useful and more will undoubtedly be discovered. However, the limitations and costs to using this technology are just starting to be explored. A thorough understanding of these areas will be increasingly important as the tools identified by basic research in plant defense mechanisms are applied more frequently to commercial crops. Previously, only a few studies have attempted to look at the costs, for example, in fitness to plants induced for one of these resistance responses and even fewer still of these studies have been with the economically important cereal crops .Most of the genes involved in broad-spectrum resistance have yet to be inserted as transgenes into crops. Therefore, investigations into the costs of induced resistance have started by assaying the effects of using chemical inducers. Heil et al. have studied the fitness of wheat plants treated with BTH in the absence of pathogens.
When plants were grown either hydroponically or in the field, water-treated control plants were able to achieve greater biomass than their BTH-treated cohorts. In field experiments, however, significant growth differences were not seen until approximately 6 weeks after treatment. The authors suggest that many of the potential fitness costs associated with induced resistance responses may be masked in laboratory experiments where growth conditions are kept optimal, and support this hypothesis with experiments performed growing plants under differing nitrogen concentrations. In addition, when the age of the plants induced for SAR was considered it was found that the growth-costs of BTH treatment could be reduced if the BTH was applied after the lateral shoot formation was complete . These data also underscore the importance of factoring plant developmental programs into any efficient strategy to enhance plant resistance by chemical treatment or genetic engineering.Another unwanted effect that may arise from transgenic manipulation of genes involved in defense signaling pathways is spontaneous cell death. Spontaneous cell death has been uncovered in many genetic screens for enhanced disease resistance and recently, has been seen in transgenic plants. These mutants and transgenic plants are often collectively referred to as lesion-mimic mutants since they display lesions similar to those observed in a defense response even in the absence of pathogens. This form of cell death in plants is sometimes influenced by alterations in environmental conditions such as light, temperature and humidity . Therefore, both in basic research and in applied experiments, it will be important to understand the parameters controlling cell death. This research is critical not only for optimizing the situations where transgenes and chemicals will be most useful to generate disease resistance, but also to minimize negative effects on important agronomic factors such as development,vertical greenhouse fertility and yield. Several dicot lesion-mimic mutants that lead to enhanced cell death have been well characterized including the Arabidopsis acdand lsdmutants . A recessive mutation in the LSD1 gene leads to a lesion-mimic phenotype that is triggered under long-day light conditions and by treatment with SA and INA .
The lsd1 mutation appears to confer hypersensitivity to these compounds . It is hypothesized that reactive oxygen species accumulate in leaf tissues preceding formation of lesions and that LSD1 normally functions to define the extent of lesion spread by suppressing cell death . ROS accumulation is observed in the initial stages of plant defense responses including during the hypersensitive response . In wild-type plants, the HR precedes the formation of micro-lesions that are correlated with induced resistance and is associated with subsequent resistance to pathogen infection . Altered accumulation patterns of ROS in plants with heightened cell death or an HR suggest that ROS play a central role in regulating plant programmed cell death . Lesion-mimic mutants have also been identified in cereals including rice, maize and barley . In rice, one well-characterized class of lesion-mimics contains the slmutants . Many of the sl mutants display heightened resistance to M. grisea and increased expression of PR-1 and peroxidase genes . Other rice lesion mimic mutants displaying enhanced resistance are the cdrmutants . The cdr mutants also have elevated PR gene expression and cell cultures of the cdr mutants under certain conditions can accumulate H2O2. Thus, a subset of rice lesion mimics may have misregulated levels of ROS . Misregulation of ROS accumulation also occurs in transgenic rice engineered to express the OsRac1gene. Over expression of OsRac1 in a wild type stimulated H2O2 accumulation in leaf tissue and over-expression in an sl background stimulated cell death . While mutant rice genes leading to lesion-mimic phenotypes have only been hypothesized to play a role in ROS regulation, one lesion-mimic-inducing gene from maize, Les22, has been cloned. Les22 encodes a uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase , an enzyme required for chlorophyll and heme biosynthesis . Mutations in the homologous human enzyme lead to the light-induced skin toxicity condition of porphyria. People with mutations in the UROD are predicted to accumulate high levels of uroporphyrin III that upon light excitation can become highly reactive resulting in toxic levels of ROS. While the Les22 mutant phenotype does not appear to be associated with enhanced resistance to pathogens, a recessive Les mutant, les9, displays enhanced resistance to the pathogen, Bipolaris maydis . Another maize lesion-mimic mutant, lls1 , a recessive mimic mutation is associated with enhanced resistance to the maize rust fungus, Puccinia sorghi . The LLS1 gene was cloned and found to encode a novel protein containing two binding motifs resembling aromatic ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase regions suggesting that this gene may also be involved in detoxification, perhaps of a phenolic compound important in mediating cell death . Finally, pathogen resistance is associated with lesion-mimic phenotypes in not only rice and maize, but also barley.The mlo mutation confers a spontaneous cell death phenotype upon pathogen challenge and noticeable formation of structural appositions under epidermal cells. Thus, the mutant phenotype confers a rapid death phenotype to the cells, halting fungal ingress at the point of challenge and preventing a compatible interaction. The wild-type allele MLO prevents cell death when challenged by E. graminus . Many mutants showing lesion-mimic or enhanced cell death phenotypes are associated with enhanced disease resistance. This does not necessarily suggest that cell death is a requirement for defense, or that defense always de-represses cell death pathways. Simply, many defense components will likely have multiple roles in basic metabolism and stress responses throughout the plant that need to be characterized before utilizing these genes for resistance engineering.Many of the examples listed above, may appear as substantial challenges to engineering disease resistance, however, these challenges provide opportunities to create plants that are even more resistant than plants engineered based on our current knowledge. For instance if the already identified components of a signaling pathway are not the best candidates for durable resistance in the field, technologies such as micro-arrays will help to pinpoint novel targets of interest . When mutations involved in disease resistance have already been identified, but are recessive in nature such as the mlo, edr1 and mpk4 mutants, classical breeding strategies can be employed. These mutants cannot be placed into heterologous systems using transgenic technology but, as with gene-pyramiding, they are still useful in breeding. Or, as technology continues to improve, gene knockouts and silencing of homologs may be employed to generate mutants in diverse species. If research continues to suggest crosstalk between ISR, SAR and insect defense signaling pathways, there may be great potential for additive defense effects by manipulating overlapping components. So, while limitations and cost of engineering broad-spectrum defenses warrant much attention, it is useful to look at such challenges as means for streamlining and improving upon current engineering strategies.Another promising strategy for enhancing resistance in plants is the use of RNA homology-dependent silencing to combat viral and bacterial disease . The nature of this silencing has been evaluated in a number of systems where similar phenomena are called by different names; RNAi in animals and quelling in fungi . One conserved step leading to RNA homology dependent silencing is the formation of a double stranded RNA intermediate. This dsRNA intermediate is recognized by an enzymatic complex which targets degradation of all corresponding homologous RNA transcripts . Several cases detailed below illustrate the possibilities for generating disease resistant plants by taking advantage of this inherent biological process.