Forward osmosis technology is also commonly used for food and drug processing

Area with high N2O emission has a relatively lower oxygen concentration due to the expansion of nutrients runoff from land. To diminish the negative environmental impacts, fertigation treatment could reduce the amount of nitrogen and nutrients input to the soil, prevent over fertilization, and excess nutrient runoff to the river. Forward osmosis has many advantages regard saving physical footprints. High waste water recovery rate, minimized resupply, and low energy cost can facilitate the sustainability of forward osmosis. However, forward osmosis has a lower membrane fouling propensity compared to other pressure-driven membrane processes. Forward osmosis is usually applied as pretreatment of reverse osmosis, the total energy consumption of a combination of FO and RO is lower than reverse osmosis alone. Moreover, osmotic backwashing can be compelling to restrict the membrane while reducing energy consumption at the same time. In the situation when Nanofiltration served as post-treatment combined with fertilizer draw forward osmosis can backwash the excess fertilizer replenishment and turn it into concentrated fertilizer draw solutions. The energy consumption of FDFO brackish water recovery using cellulose triacetate is affected by draw solution concentration , flow rates ,fodder systems for cattle and membrane selection. Membrane orientation and the flow rates have a minor effect on specific energy consumption compared to draw solution concentration. A diluted fertilizer draw solution can boost the system’s performance while a higher draw solution concentration can lower the specific energy consumption.

Moreover, a lower flow rate with a higher draw solution concentration can diminish the energy consumption of fertilizer draw forward osmosis to the lowest. This additional process would increase the energy consumption of the system. However, nanofiltration is necessary for desalination and direct fertigation treatment.The energy consumption of the nanofiltration process is determined by the environmental impacts, such as recovery rate, membrane lifetime, and membrane cleaning. Forward osmosis technology performs a 40-50% reduction in specific energy consumption compared to other alternatives. As a result, FO technology has the potential for wide adoption in drinking water treatment. Another area of application of FO usage is seawater desalination/brine removal, direct fertigation, wastewater reclamation, and wastewater minimization. Without the draw solution recovery step, forward osmosis could be applied as osmotic concentration. For example,fertilizer-draw forward osmosis is widely accepted for the freshwater supply and direct fertigation. However, in terms of the evaporative desalination process, it is more practical to treat the water with a lower total dissolved solid /salinity. Forward osmosis technology can be combined with other treatment methods such as reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, or ultrafiltration for different water treatment purposes. To be more specific, forward osmosis can be an alternative pre-treatment in conventional filtration/separation system ; an alternative process to conventional membrane treatment system ; a post-treatment process to recycle the volume of excess waste . The standalone forward osmosis process usually combines with additional post-treatment to meet the water quality standards for different purposes.

Forward osmosis has been researched in the past. In this review, we focused on fertilizer drawn forward osmosis, which can not only remove brine but also reduce multiple nutrient inputs such as nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and so on. Since a proper draw solution can reduce the concentration polarization, the draw solution selection becomes vital for both FO and FDFO processes. Moreover, different fertilizer draws solutions have various influences on energy consumption. The nutrient concentrations of treated water are controllable using the fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis treatment method. The composition of nutrients can be adjusted in the draw solution to produce water with different ratios of nutrients, which makes fertilizer draw forward osmosis a nearly perfect treatment method for direct fertigation. For the purpose of reducing N2O emissions, the removal rate of nitrogen in fertigation water is required to be improved using fertilizer drawn forward osmosis and nanofiltration. When nanofiltration is applied as post-treatment with fertilizer drawn forward osmosis, the nitrogen removal rate can reach up to 82.69% while using SOA as the draw solution. This number shows that treatment of fertigation can reach a higher standard of water quality attenuating nitrogen concentrations. As a result, lower nitrogen input in fertigation can significantly decrease the nitrous oxide emission from the soil for sustainable agricultural use. Forward osmosis can be also combined with other treatment methods to resolve the freshwater shortage problem. Despite the traditional seawater desalination treatment incorporating forward osmosis and reverse osmosis, the hybrid process of reverse osmosis and fertilizer drawn forward osmosis can remove the brine from water and lower the final nutrient concentration with a higher recovery rate. Lastly, the value of water flux, recirculation rate, draw solution concentration, membrane lifetime, and membrane cleaning can all be adjusted to minimize energy consumption as much as possible. In conclusion, FO and FDFO technologies are both environmentally friendly and economically for desalination and fertigation.

Evapotranspiration estimation is important for precision agriculture, especially precision water management. Mapping the ET temporally and spatially can identify variations in the field, which is useful for evaluating soil moisture and assessing crop water status. ET estimation can also benefit water resource management and weather forecast. ET is a combination of two separate processes, evaporation and transpiration . Evaporation is the process whereby liquid water is converted to water vapor through latent heat exchange. Transpiration is the process of the vaporization of liquid water contained in plant tissues,fodder sprouting system and the vapor removal to the atmosphere. The current theory for transpiration is constituted by the following three steps. First, the conversion of liquid-phase water to vapor water causes canopy cooling from latent heat exchange. Thus, canopy temperature can be used as an indicator of ET. Second, diffusion of water vapor from inside plant stomata on the leaves to the surrounding atmosphere. Third, atmospheric air mixing by convection or diffusion transports vapor near the plant surfaces to the upper atmosphere or off-site away from the plant canopy. Usually, evaporation and transpiration occur simultaneously.These direct ET methods, however, are usually point-specific or area-weighted measurements and cannot be extended to a large scale because of the heterogeneity of the land surface. The experimental equipment is also costly and requires substantial expense and effort, such as lysimeters, which are only available for a small group of researchers. For indirect methods, there are energy balance methods and remote sensing methods. For energy balance methods, Bowen ratio and eddy covariance have been widely used in ET estimation. However, they are also area-weighted measurements. Remote sensing techniques can detect variations in vegetation and soil conditions over space and time. Thus, they have been considered as some of the most powerful methods for mapping and estimating spatial ET over the past decades. Remote sensing models have been useful in accounting for the spatial variability of ET at regional scales when using satellite platforms such as Landsat and ASTER. Since the satellite started being applied, several remote sensing models have been developed to estimate ET, such as surface energy balance algorithm for land, mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration, the dual temperature difference, and the Priestley–Taylor TSEB. Remote sensing techniques can provide information such as normalized difference vegetation index , leaf area index , surface temperature, and surface albedo. Related research on these parameters has been discussed by different researchers. As a new remote sensing platform, researchers are very interested in the potential of small UAVs for precision agriculture, especially on heterogenous crops, such as vineyard and orchards.

UAVs overcome some of the remote sensing limitations faced by satellite. For example, satellite remote sensing is prone to cloud cover; UAVs are below the clouds. Unlike satellites, UAVs can be operated at any time if the weather is within operating limitations. The satellite has a fixed flight path; UAVs are more mobile and adaptive for site selection. Mounted on the UAVs, lightweight sensors, such as RGB cameras, multispectral cameras, and thermal infrared cameras, can be used to collect high-resolution images. The higher temporal and spatial resolution images, relatively low operational costs, and the nearly real-time image acquisition, make the UAVs an ideal platform for mapping and monitoring ET. Many researchers have already used UAVs for ET estimation, as shown in Table 1. For example, in Ortega-Farías et al. implemented a remote sensing energy balance algorithm for estimating energy components in an olive orchard, such as incoming solar radiation, sensible heat flux, soil heat flux, and latent heat flux. Optical sensors were mounted on a UAV to provide high spatial resolution images. By using the UAV platform, experiment results show that the RSEB algorithm can estimate latent heat flux and sensible heat flux with errors of 7% and 5%, respectively. It demonstrated that UAV could be used as an excellent platform to evaluate the spatial variability of ET in the olive orchard.There are two objectives for this paper. First, to examine current applications of UAVs for ET estimation. Second, to explore the current uses and limitations of UAVs, such as UAVs’ technical and regulatory restrictions, camera calibrations, and data processing issues. There are many other ET estimation methods, such as surface energy balance index, crop water stress index , simplified surface energy balance index, and surface energy balance system, which have not been applied with UAVs. Therefore, they are out of the scope of this article. This study is not intended to provide an exhaustive review of all direct or indirect methods that have been developed for ET estimation. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces different UAV types being used for ET estimation. Several commonly used lightweight sensors are also compared in Section 2. The ET estimation methods being used with UAV platforms, as shown in Table 1, are discussed. In Section 3, different results of ET estimation methods and models are compared and discussed. Challenges and opportunities, such as thermal camera calibration, UAV path planning, and image processing, are discussed in Section 4. Lastly, the authors share views regarding ET estimation with UAVs in future research and draw conclusive remarks. Many kinds of UAVs are used for different research purposes, including ET estimation. Some popular UAV platforms are shown in Figure 1. Typically, there are two types of UAV platforms, fixed-wings and multirotors. Fixed-wings can usually fly longer with a larger payload. They can usually fly for about 2 h, which is suitable for a large field. Multirotors can fly about 30 min, which is suitable for short flight missions. Both of them have been used in agricultural research, such as, which promises great potential in ET estimation.Mounted on UAVs, many sensors can be used for collecting UAV imagery, such as multispectral and thermal images, for ET estimation. For example, the Survey 3 camera has four bands, blue, green, red, and near-infrared , with a spectral resolution of 4608 × 3456 pixels, and a spatial resolution of 1.01 cm/pixel. The Survey 3 camera has a fast interval timer, 2 s for JPG mode, and 3 s for RAW + JPG mode. Faster interval timer would benefit the overlap design for UAV flight missions, such as reducing the flight time, and enabling higher overlapping. Another multi-spectral camera being commonly used is the Rededge M. The Rededge M has five bands, which are blue, green, red, near-infrared, and red edge. It has a spectral resolution of 1280 × 960 pixel, with a 46field of view. With a Downwelling Light Sensor , which is a 5-band light sensor that connects to the camera, the Rededge M can measure the ambient light during a flight mission for each of the five bands. Then, it can record the light information in the metadata of the images captured by the camera. After the camera calibration, the information detected by the DLS can be used to correct lighting changes during a flight, such as changes in cloud cover during a UAV flight. The thermal camera ICI 9640 P has been used for collecting thermal images as reported in. The thermal camera has a resolution of 640 × 480 pixels. The spectral band is from 7 to 14 µm. The dimensions of the thermal camera are 34 × 30 × 34 mm. The accuracy is designed to be ±2 C. A Raspberry Pi Model B computer can be used to trigger the thermal camera during flight missions. The SWIR 640 P-Series , which is a shortwave infrared camera, can also be used for ET estimation. The spectral band is from 0.9 µm to 1.7 µm. The accuracy for the SWIR camera is ±1 C. It has a resolution of 640 × 512 pixels.

Crop yields can also vary endogenously in response to demand and price changes

Typically, they allow for endogenous structural adjustments in land use, management, commodity production, and consumption in response to exogenous scenario drivers . However, with several components of productivity parameters endogenously determined, it can be difficult to isolate the potential role of livestock efficiency changes due to technological breakthroughs or policy incentives. For example, as production decreases due to decreasing demand, so could productivity. In this case, a design feature can be a design faw for sensitivity analysis and policy assessment focused on individual key system parameters, even if model results can be further decomposed to disentangle endogenous and exogenous productivity contributions . Accounting-based land sector models, such as the FABLE Calculator, which we also employ in this current study, can offer similarly detailed sector representation, without the governing market mechanisms, thus allowing fully tunable parameters for exploring policy impacts . This feature facilitates quantifying uncertainty and bounding estimates through sensitivity analyses. The FABLE Calculator is a sophisticated land use accounting model that can capture several of the key determinants of agricultural land use change and GHG emissions without the complexity of an optimization based economic model. Its high degree of transparency and accessibility also make it an appealing tool to facilitate stakeholder engagement.This paper explores the impacts of healthier diets and increased crop yields on U.S. GHG emissions and land use,dutch buckets as well as how these impacts vary across assumptions of future livestock productivity and ruminant density in the U.S. We employ two complementary land use modeling approaches.

The first is the FABLE Calculator , a land use and GHG accounting model based on biophysical characteristics of the agricultural and land use sectors with high agricultural commodity representation. The second is a spatially-explicit partial equilibrium optimization model for global land use systems . The combination of these modeling approaches allows us to provide both detailed representation of agricultural commodities with high flexibility in scenario design and a dynamic representation of land use in response to known economic forces , qualities that are difficult to achieve in a single model. Both modeling frameworks allow us to project to 2050 U.S. national scale agricultural production, diets, land-use, and carbon emissions and sequestration under varying policy and productivity assumptions. Our work makes several advances to sustainability research. First, using agricultural and forestry models that capture market and intersectoral dynamics, this is the first non-LCA study to examine the sustainability of a healthier average U.S. diet . Second, using two complementary modeling approaches, this is the first study to explore the GHG and land use effects of the interaction of healthy diets and agricultural productivity. Specifically, we examined key assumptions about diet, livestock productivity, ruminant density, and crop productivity. Two of the key production parameters we consider—livestock productivity and stocking density—are affected by a transition to healthier diets but have not been extensively discussed in the agricultural economic modeling literature. Third, we isolate the effects of healthier diets in the U.S. alone, in the rest of the world, and globally, which is especially important given the comparative advantage of U.S. agriculture in global trade.To model multiple policy assumptions across dimensions of food and land use and have full flexibility in terms of parameter assumptions and choice of underlying data sets, we customized a land use accounting model built in Excel, the FABLE Calculator , for the U.S. Below we describe the design of the Calculator, but for more details we direct the reader to the complete model documentation .

The FABLE Calculator represents 76 crop and livestock products using data from the FAOSTAT database. The model first specifies demand for these commodities under selected scenarios , the Calculator computes agricultural production and other metrics, land use change, food consumption, trade, GHG emissions, water use, and land for biodiversity. The key advantages of the Calculator include its speed, the number and diversity of scenario design elements , simplicity, and its transparency. However, unlike economic models using optimization techniques, the Calculator does not consider commodity prices in generating the results, does not have any spatial representation, and does not represent different production practices. The following assumptions can be adjusted in the Calculator to create scenarios: GDP, population, diet composition, population activity level, food waste, imports, exports, livestock productivity, crop productivity, agricultural land expansion or contraction, reforestation, climate impacts on crop production, protected areas, post-harvest losses, bio-fuels. Scenario assumptions in the Calculator rely on “shifters” or time-step-specific relative changes that are applied to an initial historic value using a user-specified implementation rate. The Calculator performs a model run through a sequence of steps or calculations, as follows: calculate human demand for each commodity; calculate livestock production; calculate crop production; calculate pasture and cropland requirements; compare the land use requirements with the available land accounting for restrictions imposed and reforestation targets; calculate the amount of feasible pasture and cropland; and calculate the feasible crop and livestock production; calculate feasible human demand; calculate indicators . See Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials for a diagram of these steps. Using U.S. national data sources, we modified or replaced the US FABLE Calculator’s default data inputs and growth assumptions based on Food and Agriculture Organization data.

Specifically, we used crop and livestock productivity assumptions from the U.S. Department of Agriculture , grazing/stock intensity using literature from U.S. studies, miscanthus and switch grass bio-energy feed stock productivity assumptions from the Billion Ton study , updated beef and other commodity exports using USDA data, and created a “Healthy Style Diet for Americans” diet using the 2015–2020 USDA Dietary Guidelines for Americans . See SM Table S6 for all other US Calculator data and assumptions. We used these U.S.-specific data updates to construct U.S. diet, yield, and livestock scenarios and sensitivities . See for a full description of the other assumptions and data sources used in the default version of the FABLE Calculator.As a complement to the FABLE Calculator’s exogenously determined trade flows, we used GLOBIOM [a widely used and well-documented global spatially explicit partial equilibrium model of the forestry and agricultural sectors. Documentation can be found at the GLOBIOM github development site to capture the dynamics of endogenously determined international trade. Unlike the FABLE Calculator, GLOBIOM is a spatial equilibrium economic optimization model based on calibrated demand and supply curves as typically employed in economic models. GLOBIOM represents 37 economic production regions, with regional consumers optimizing consumption based on relative output prices, income, and preferences. The model maximizes the sum of consumer and producer surplus by solving for market equilibrium and using the spatial equilibrium modeling approach described in McCarl and Spreen and Takayama and Judge . Product-specific demand curves and growth rates over time allow for selective analysis of preference or dietary change through augmenting demand shift parameters over time to reflect differences in relative demand for specific commodities . Production possibilities in GLOBIOM apply spatially explicit information aggregated to Simulation Units, which are aggregates of 5 pixels of the same altitude, slope, and soil class, within the same 30 arcmin pixel, and within the same country. Land use, production and prices are calibrated to FAOSTAT from the 2000 historic period. Production systems parameters and emissions coefficients for specific crop and livestock technologies are based on detailed biophysical process models,grow bucket including EPIC for crops and RUMINANT for livestock . Livestock and crop productivity changes are reflected by both endogenous and exogenous components. For crop production, GLOBIOM yields can be shifted exogenously to reflect technological or environmental change assumptions and their associated impact on yields. Exogenous yield changes are accompanied by changes in input use intensity and costs .A similar approach has been applied in other U.S.-centric land sector models, including the intertemporal approach outlined in Wade et al. . Furthermore, reflecting potential yield growth with input intensification per unit area is consistent with observed intensification of some inputs in the U.S. agricultural system. This includes nitrogen fertilizer intensity , which grew approximately 0.4% per year from 1988 to 2018 .

Higher prices can induce production system intensification or crop mix shifts across regions to exploit regional comparative advantages. GLOBIOM accounts for several different crop management techniques, including subsistence-level , low input, high input, and high input irrigated systems. The model simulates spatiotemporal allocation of production patterns and bilateral trade fows for key agriculture and forest commodities. Regional trade patterns can shift depending on changes in market or policy factors that Baker et al. and Janssens et al. explore in greater detail in addition to providing a more comprehensive documentation of the GLOBIOM approach to international trade dynamics, including cost structures and drivers of trade expansion or contraction, or establishing new bilateral trade flows. This approach allows for flexibility in trade adjustments at both the intensive and extensive margins given a policy or productivity change in a given region. GLOBIOM has been applied extensively to a wide range of relevant topics, including climate impacts assessment , mitigation policy analysis , diet transitions , and sustainable development goals . We designed new U.S. and rest-of-the world diet and yield scenarios , and ran all scenarios at medium resolution for the U.S. and coarse resolution for ROW. We chose Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2 macroeconomic and population growth assumptions for all parameters across all scenarios when not specified or overridden by scenario assumptions .We aligned multiple assumptions in the FABLE Calculator with GLOBIOM inputs and/or outputs to isolate the impacts of specific parameter changes in livestock productivity and ruminant density. Specifically, we used the same set of U.S. healthy diet shifters in both models, but aligned the US FABLE Calculator’s crop yields and trade assumptions with GLOBIOM outputs to isolate the effects of increasing the ruminant livestock productivity growth rate and reducing the ruminant grazing density using the Calculator . While we developed high and baseline crop yield inputs for GLOBIOM, actual yields are reported because of the endogenous nature of yields in GLOBIOM. This two model approach allows us to explore the impact of exogenous changes to the livestock sector that cannot be fully exogenous in GLOBIOM. Subsequent methods sections describe each of these scenarios and sensitivity inputs in greater detail.We constructed a “Healthy U.S. diet” using the “Healthy U.S.-style Eating Pattern” from the USDA and US Department of Health and Human Services’ 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans . We use a 2600 kcal average diet. This is a reduction of about 300 kcal from the current average U.S. diet given that the current diet is well over the Minimum Dietary Energy Recommendations of 2075 kcal, computed as a weighted average of energy requirement per sex, age, and activity level and the population projections by sex and age class following the FAO methodology . The DGA recommends quantities of aggregate and specific food groups in units of ounces and cup-equivalents on a daily or weekly basis. We chose representative foods in each grouping to convert volume or mass recommendations into kcal/day equivalents and assigned groupings and foods to their closest equivalent US Calculator product grouping . For DGA food groups that consist of more than one US Calculator product group, e.g., “Meats, poultry, eggs”, we used the proportion of each product group in the baseline American diet expressed in kcal/day and applied it to the aggregated kcal from the DGA to get the recommended DGA kcal for each product group . We made one manual modification to this process by increasing the DGA recommendation for beef from a calculated value of 36 kcal/day to 50 kcal/day, since trends in the last decade have shown per capita beef consumption exceeding that of pork . This process led to a total daily intake of 2576 kcal for the healthy U.S. diet . The Baseline, average U.S. diet is modeled in the US FABLE Calculator using FAO reported values on livestock and crop production by commodity in weight for use as food in the U.S., applying the share of each commodity that is wasted, then allocating weight of each commodity to specific food product groups , converting weight to kcal, and finally dividing by the total population and days in a year to get per capita kcal/day. See the Calculator for more details and commodity specific assumptions . This healthy U.S. diet expressed in kcal was used directly in the Calculator as a basis for human consumption demand calculations for specific crop and livestock commodities.

The harvested materials were frozen and ground into fine powder in liquid nitrogen

Previous studies have shown that SL promotes photomorphogenesis by increasing HY5 level . However, the molecular links from SL signaling to HY5 regulation have remained unclear. Our results show that BZS1 mediates SL regulation of HY5 level and photomorphogenesis. Similar to hy5-215, BZS1-SRDX seedlings are partially insensitive to GR24 treatment under light , which indicates that BZS1 plays a positive role in SL regulation of seedling morphogenesis. Actually, BZS1 is the only member in the subfamily IV of B-box protein family that is regulated by SL , suggesting that BZS1 plays a unique role in SL regulation of photomorphogenesis. As BZS1 increases HY5 level, SL activation of BZS1 expression would contribute, together with inactivation of COP1 , to the SL-induced HY5 accumulation. On the other hand, the BZS1-SRDX plants showed normal branching phenotypes , which suggests that BZS1 is only involved in SL regulation of HY5 activity and seedling photomorphogenesis but not shoot branching. Our finding of BZS1 function in SL response further supports a key role for BZS1 in integration of light, BR and SL signals to control seedling photomorphogenesis . To generate 15N-labeled seeds, Arabidopsis plants were grown hydroponically in diluted Hoagland solution containing 10 mM K15NO3 . One eighth diluted Hoagland medium was used at seedling stage and 1/4 Hoagland medium was used when plant started to bolt. After the siliques were fully developed, 1/8 Hoagland medium was used till seeds were fully mature. For SILIA-IP-MS assay,strawberry gutter system the 14N- or 15N-labeled seeds were grown on Hoagland medium containing 10 mM K14NO3 or K15NO3, respectively, for 5 days under constant white light.

The seedlings were harvested and ground to fine powder in liquid nitrogen. Five grams each of 14N-labeled BZS1-YFP or YFP and 15N-labeled wild-type tissue power were mixed and total proteins were extracted using extraction buffer . After removing the cell debris by centrifugation, 20 μL GFP-Trap®_MA Beads were added to the supernatant and then incubated in the cold room for 2 h with constant rotating. The beads were washed three times with IP wash buffer . The proteins were eluted twice using 50 μL 2 × SDS sample loading buffer by incubating at 95°C for 10 min. The isotope labels were switched in repeat experiments. The eluted proteins were separated by NuPAGE® Novex 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel . After Colloidal Blue staining , the gel was cut into five fractions for trypsin digestion. In-gel digestion procedure was performed according to Tang et al. . Extracted peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry . The LC separation was performed using an Eksigent 425 NanoLC system on a C18 trap column and a C18 analytical column . Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water, and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The flow rate was 300 nL/min. The MS/MS analysis was conducted with a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive mass spectrometer in positive ion mode and data dependent acquisition mode to automatically switch between MS and MS/MS acquisition. The identification and quantification were done by pFind and pQuant softwares in an open search mode. The parameters of software were set as follows: parent mass tolerance, 15 ppm; fragment mass tolerance, 0.6 Da. The FDR of the pFind analysis was 1% for peptides. Arabidopsis TAIR10 database was used for data search. Three-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings expressing BZS1-YFP or YFP alone were grown under constant light and used for BZS1-COP1 co-immunoprecipitation assay. For the BZS1, HY5 and STH2 co-immunoprecipitation assay, about one-month-old healthy Nicotiana benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 harboring corresponding plasmids.

The plants were then grown under constant light for 48 h and infiltrated leaves were collected. Total proteins from 0.3 g tissue powder were extracted with 0.6 mL extraction buffer . The lysate was pre-cleared by centrifugation twice at 20,000 g for 10 min at 4°C, and then diluted with equal volume of extraction buffer without Triton X-100. Twenty microliter of Pierce Protein A Magnetic Beads coupled with 10 μg anti-GFP polyclonal antibody were added to each protein extract and incubated at 4°C for 1 h with rotation. The beads were then collected by DynaMag™-2 Magnet and washed three times with wash buffer . The bonded proteins were eluted with 50 μL 2 × SDS loading buffer by incubating at 95°C for 10 min. For western blot analysis, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane by semi-dry transfer cell . The membrane was blocked with 5% none-fat milk followed by primary and secondary antibodies. Chemiluminescence signal was detected using SuperSignal™ West Dura Extended Duration Substrate and FluorChem™ Q System . Monoclonal GFP antibody was purchased from Clontech, USA. Myc antibody and ubiquitin antibody were from Cell Signaling Technology, USA.HY5 and COP1 antibodies were from Dr. Hongquan Yang’s lab. Secondary antibodies goat anti-mouse-HRP or goat anti-rabbitHRP were from Bio-Rad Laboratories. Arundo donax is a tall grass that is native from the lower Himalayas and invaded the Mediterranean region, prior to its introduction in the America’s . It is suspected to first have been introduced to the United States in the 1700’s, and in the Los Angeles area in the 1820’s by Spanish settlers . Its primary use was for erosion control in drainage canals.

A number of other uses for Arundo have been identified. It is the source of reeds for single reed wind instruments such as clarinet and the saxophone . In Europe and Morocco Arundo is used for waste water treatment , such as nutrient and heavy metal removal, and water volume evapotranspiration. The high rate of evapotranspiration by stands of this species, used as a benefit in these countries, is one of the characteristics that is detrimental in the California ecosystems invaded by Arundo. By the 1990’s Arundo has infested tens of thousands of acres in California riparian ecosystems, and these populations affect the functioning of these systems in different ways. It increases the fire hazard in the dry season . The regular fires promoted by the dense Arundo vegetation, are changing the nature of the ecosystem from a flood-defined to a fire-defined system . During floods, Arundo plant material can accumulate in large debris dams against flood control structures and bridges, and interfere with flood water control management , and bridges across Southern California rivers. It can grow up to 8-9 m tall, and its large leaf surface area can cause the evapotranspiration of up to 3 x the amount of water that would be lost from the water table by the native, riparian vegetation . Displacement of the native vegetation results in habitat loss for desired bird species, such as the federally endangered Least Bell’s Vireo and the threatened Willow Flycatcher . Due to the problems listed above, removal of Arundo from California ecosystems has been one of the priorities of a variety of organizations and agencies involved in the management of the state’s natural resources, such as the California Department of Fish & Game, a number of resource conservation districts. In the practice of Arundo control,grow strawberry in containers both mechanical and chemical methods of Arundo control are applied, sometimes in combination , the choice of their use depending on timing, terrain, vegetation, and funding. The risks, costs, and effects of the different control methods were listed in the most recent Arundo and saltcedar workshop by . The timing of the eradication effort can be affected by a number of factors other than the biology of the target species, such as limitations due to bird nesting season, and funding availability. Ideally, the timing of any eradication effort, chemical or mechanical should be determined by the ecophysiology of the target species, in this case Arundo donax, rather than the calendar year. For chemical eradication, this has been recognized for a while, as stated by Nelroy Jackson of Monsanto, at the first Arundo workshop: “Timing of application for optimal control is important. Best results from foliar applications of Rodeo© or Roundup© are obtained when the herbicides are applied in late summer to early fall, when the rate of downward translocation of glyphosate would be greatest.” A similar statement has not yet been made for the timing of mechanical eradication methods, nor had the effect of timing on the effectiveness of mechanical eradication been identified. Mechanical eradication of Arundo can be attempted in many different manners. The most frequently used method is the cutting of the above ground material, the plant’s tall stems. Another method of mechanical eradication is digging out the underground biomass, the rhizomes. The cutting of stems can occur before and after herbicide applications.

The large amount of standing above ground biomass, up to 45 kg/m2 impedes the removal of the cut material, because the costs will be too high. The costs associated with the removal of the large biomass of the stems, has led to the use of “chippers” that will cut the stems into pieces of approximately 5 – 10 cm in situ. After these efforts, the chipped fragments are left in place. A small fraction of the fragments left behind after chipping will contain a meristem. The stem pieces of these fragments may have been left intact, or split lengthwise. In the second case the node at which the meristem at located will have been split as well. On many pieces with a meristem, the meristem itself may still be intact. These stem fragments might sprout and regenerate into new Arundo plants . If stems are not cut into small pieces, or removed after cutting, the tall, cut stems can be washed into the watershed during a flood event. This material can accumulate behind bridges and water control structures with possible consequences as described in the introduction. Meristems on the stems can also sprout, and lead to the establishment of new stands of Arundo at the eradication project site, or down river . A. donax stands have a high stem density. The outer stalks of dense stands will start to lean to the outside because the leaves produced during the growing season push the stems in the stand apart. After the initial leaning due to crowding, gravity will pull the tall outside stems almost horizontal . Throughout this report these outside hanging stems will be referred to as “hanging stems”. The horizontal orientation causes hormonal asymmetry in these stems. The main hormones involved are IAA , GA and ethylene . The unusual IAA and GA distributions cause the side shoots developing on these hanging stems, to grow vertically. IAA also plays an important role in plant root development , and may therefore have a stimulative effect on root emergence from the adventious shoot meristem on fragments that originated from hanging stems, that would be absent in stem fragments from upright stems. In a preliminary experiment comparing root emergence between stem fragments from hanging and upright stems, 38% of the hanging stemstem fragments developed roots, while none of the upright stem-stem fragments showed root emergence . These results indicated the need for further study into the possibility that new A. donax plants can regenerate from the stem fragments with shoot meristems that might be dispersed during mechanical Arundo removal efforts. In order to apply herbicides at that time that the rate of downward translocation of photosynthates and herbicide would be greatest, this time period has to be established. Carbohydrate distribution and translocation within indeterminate plants, such as Arundo, results from the balance between the supply of carbon compounds to and the nitrogen concentration in the different plant tissues. Carbon and nitrogen are the most important elements in plant tissues. Due to different diffusion rates of NO3 – and NH4 + in soil water versus that of CO2 in air, and differences in plant N and C uptake rates, plant growth will earlier become nitrogen limited than carbon limited. During plant development tissue nitrogen concentrations are diluted by plant growth , which is mainly based on the addition of carbohydrates to the tissues. When plant growth becomes nitrogen limited, the tissue will maintain the minimum nitrogen content needed for the nucleic acids and proteins that maintain metabolic function. At this low tissue nitrogen content, there is not enough nitrogen in an individual cell to provide the nucleic acids and proteins to support the metabolism of two cells, therefore the cells cannot divide. This means that the tissue cannot grow anymore , until it receives a new supply of nitrogen.

SA treatment and SA deficiency conferred by NahG did not significantly impact ABA levels

The results suggest that SA responses in tomato play a less important role in defense against Phytophthora capsici than to Pst. The impact of SA and plant activators on ABA accumulation was measured in tomato roots and shoots.However, ABA accumulation in non-stressed TDL and BTH treatments trended higher than those observed in salt-stressed plants that did not receive a plant activator treatment . Protection by TDL against Pst is likely the result of a triggered SAR response and not the result of an antagonistic effect on ABA levels. The efficacy of plant activators depends on the specific diseases targeted and the environmental context, which may present additional stressors to confound defense network signaling in the plant. A challenge for successful deployment of plant activators in the field is to manage the allocation, ecological and fitness costs that are associated with induced defenses . These costs can be manifested by reduced growth and reproduction, vulnerability to other forms of attack, and potential interference with beneficial associations . It would seem that the severity of these costs is conditioned in part by the milieu of abiotic stressors operative at any given time. Reactive oxygen species contribute to the initiation of SAR , are induced by SA and BTH , and are essential co-substrates for induced defense responses such as lignin synthesis . ROS also are important in modulating abiotic stress networks, for example in ABA signaling and response . The potential compounding effect of ROS generated from multiple stressors presents a dilemma in that the plant must reconcile these to adapt or else suffer the negative consequences of oxidative damage for failure to do so . Paradoxically, SA and BTH also are reported to protect plants against paraquat toxicity, blueberry grow pot which involves ROS generation for its herbicidal action . How plants balance ROS’s signaling roles and destructive effects within multiple stress contexts is unresolved and a critically important area of plant biology with relevance for optimizing induced resistance strategies in crop protection .

Although our experiments were conducted under highly controlled conditions, the results with TDL are encouraging and show that chemically induced resistance to bacterial speck disease occurs in both salt-stressed and non-stressed plants and in plants severely compromised in SA accumulation. Future research with plant activators should consider their use within different abiotic stress contexts to fully assess outcomes in disease and pest protection.These syntenies of wheat and rye chromosomes permit the formation of compensating translocations of wheat and rye chromosomes. A compensating translocation is genetically equivalent to either of the two parental chromosomes; that is, it carries all relevant genes, but not necessarily in the same order. On the other hand, homoeology between wheat group 1S and rye 1S arms permitted induction of homoeologous genetic recombination, thus the development of recombinants of much smaller segments of rye 1RS to wheat than the entire arm. Many of the present wheat cultivars developed by breeding for disease resistance carry a spontaneous centric rye-wheat translocation 1RS.1BL that has been very popular in wheat breeding programs . This translocation contains a short arm of rye chromosome 1, and the long arm of wheat chromosome 1BL . It must have occurred by misdivision of centromeres of the two group 1 chromosomes, and fusion of released arms and first appeared in two cultivars from the former Soviet Union, Aurora and Kavkaz. Rye chromosome arm 1RS in the translocation contains genes for resistance to insect pest and fungal disease but as it spread throughout wheat breeding programs it became apparent that the translocation was also responsible for a yield boost in the absence of pests and disease . Besides the presence of genes for resistance and yield advantage on 1RS, there is a disadvantage of 1RS in wheat due to the presence of the rye seed storage protein secalin, controlled by the Sec-1 locus on 1RS, and the absence of the wheat loci, Gli-B1 and Glu-B3, on the 1RS arm. Lukaszewski modified the 1RS.1BL translocation by removing the Sec-1 locus and adding Gli-B1 and Glu-B3 on the 1RS arm. Lukaszewski developed a set of wheat−rye translocations, derived from ‘Kavkaz’ winter wheat that added 1RS to wheat arms 1AL, 1BL, and 1DL in spring bread wheat ‘Pavon 76’, a high yielding spring wheat from CIMMYT.

Studies showed that the chromosomal position of 1RS in the wheat genome affected agronomic performance as well as bread-making quality . Using the 1RS translocation, Lukaszewski developed a total of 183 wheatrye short arm recombinant lines for group 1 chromosomes in a near-isogenic background of cv. Pavon 76 bread wheat. Out of 183 recombinant chromosomes, 110 were from 1RS- 1BS combinations, 26 from 1RS-1AS and 47 from1RS-1DS combinations. Mago et al. used some of these lines to link molecular markers with rust resistance genes on 1RS. These recombinant brea kpoint populations provide a powerful platform to locate region specific genes. Wheat roots have two main classes, seminal roots and nodal roots . Seminal roots originate from the scutellar and epiblast nodes of the germinating embryonic hypocotyls, and nodal roots, emerge from the coleoptiler nodes at the base of the apical culm . The subsequent tillers produce their own nodal roots, two to four per node and thus contribute towards correlation of root and shoot development . The seminal roots constitute from 1-14% of the entire root system and the nodal roots constitute the rest . Genetic variation for root characteristics was reported in wheat and other crop species . Genetic variability for seedling root number was studied among different Triticum species at diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid level and it was found to be positively correlated with seed weight . In a hydroponic culture study in winter wheat, Mian et al. found significant genotypic differences in root and shoot fresh weights, number of roots longer than 40 cm, longest root length and total root length. Wheat genotypes with larger root systems in hydroponic culture were higher yielding in field conditions than those with smaller root systems . Also, wheat yield stability across variable moisture regimes was associated with greater root biomass production under drought stress . Studies in other cereal crops associated quantitative trait loci for root traits with the QTL for grain yield under field conditions. Champoux et al. provided the first report of specific chromosomal regions in any cereal likely to contain genes affecting root morphology. They reported that QTL associated with root traits such as root thickness, root dry weight per tiller, root dry weight per tiller below 30 cm,hydroponic bucket and root to shoot ratio shared common chromosomal regions with putative QTL associated with field drought avoidance/tolerance in rice. Price and Tomos also mapped QTL for root growth using a different population than that used by Champoux et al. in rice.

In a field study of maize recombinant lines, QTL for root architecture and above ground biomass production shared the same location . Tuberosa et al. reported the overlap of QTL for root characteristics in maize grown in hydroponic culture with QTL for grain yield in the field under well-watered and droughted regimes occurred in 8 different regions. They observed that QTL for weight of nodal and seminal roots were most frequently and consistently overlapped with QTL for grain yield in drought and well watered field conditions. Also, at four QTL regions, increase in weight of the nodal and seminal roots was positively associated with grain yield under both irrigation regimes in the field. There are a few reports on QTL studies for root traits in durum wheat but none has been reported in bread wheat. Kubo et al. studied root penetration ability in durum wheat. They used discs of paraffin and Vaseline mixtures as substitute for compact soil. Later, a QTL analysis was done for the number of roots penetrating the poly vinyl disc, total number of seminal and crown roots, root penetration index and root dry weight . The QTL for number of roots penetrating the poly vinyl disc and root penetration index was located on chromosome 6A and a QTL for root dry weight was located on 1B. Wang et al. demonstrated significant positive heterosis for root traits among wheat F1 hybrids. They showed that 27% of the genes were differentially expressed between hybrids and their parents. They suggested the possible role of differential gene expression in root heterosis of wheat, and possible other cereal crops. In a recent molecular study of heterosis, Yao et al. speculated that up-regulation of TaARF, an open reading frame encoding a putative wheat ARF protein, might contribute to heterosis observed in wheat root and leaf growth. Rye, wheat and barley develop 4-6 seminal roots which show a high degree of vascular segmentation . Feldman traced files of metaxylem to their levels of origin in maize root apex and showed their differentiation behind the root apex in three-dimensional model. In drier environments, Richards and Passioura demonstrated that genotypes, when selected for narrow root xylem vessels as against unselected controls, yielded up to 3%-11% more than the unselected controls depending upon their genetic background. This yield increase in the selections with narrow root vessel was correlated with a significantly higher harvest index, also higher biomass at maturity and kernel number. Huang et al. indicated the decrease in diameter of metaxylem vessel and stele with increase in temperature which resulted in decreased axial water flow in wheat roots. The decrease in axial water flow is very critical in conserving water during vegetative growth and making it available during reproductive phase of the plant. In a recent study on root anatomy, QTL for metaxylem were identified on the distal end of the long arm of chromosome 10 of rice . In another comparative study of rye DNA sequences with rice genome, the distal end of the long arm of chromosome 10 of rice showed synteny to the 1RS chromosome arm . The 1RS.1BL chromosome is now being used in many wheat breeding programs. Rye has the most highly developed root system among the temperate cereals and it is more tolerant to abiotic stresses such as drought, heat, and cold than bread wheat .

Introgression of rye chromatin into wheat may enlarge the wheat root system. Manske and Vlek reported thinner roots and higher relative root density for 1RS.1BL translocations compared with their non-translocated bread wheat checks in an acid soil, but not under better soil conditions. Repeated studies with the 1RS translocation lines of Pavon 76 have demonstrated a consistent and reproducible association between root biomass and the presence and position, of the rye 1RS arm . The increased grain yield of 1RS translocations under field conditions observed and reported earlier may be due to the consistent tendency of 1RS to produce more root biomass and also to the higher transpiration rate measured .Those authors have shown a significant increase of root biomass in wheat lines with 1RS translocations, and a positive correlation between root biomass and grain yield. All translocations of 1RS: with 1A, 1B, and 1D chromosomes have shown increased root biomass and branching as compared to Pavon 76 and there was differential expression for root biomass among these translocation lines with ranking 1RS.1AL > 1RS.1DL > 1RS.1BL > Pavon 76. In Colorado, the 1RS.1AL translocation with 1RS from Amigo showed 23% yield increase under field conditions over its winter wheat check, Karl 92 . Many present day bread wheat cultivars carry a centric rye-wheat translocation 1RS.1BL in place of chromosome 1B . Originally the translocation was thought to have been fixed because the 1RS arm of rye carries genes for resistance to various leaf and stem fungal diseases and insects . However, the translocation increased grain yield even in the absence of pathogens . It has been shown recently that this yield increase may be a direct consequence of a substantially increased root biomass . Studies by Ehdaie et al. 2003 showed a significant increase of root biomass in wheat lines with 1RS translocations and a positive correlation between root biomass and grain yield. In sand cultures, all three 1RS translocations on 1AL, 1BL, and 1DL in ‘Pavon 76’ genetic background showed clear position effects with more root biomass and root branching over Pavon 76 .

The transcript level of ALS3 target gene increased in AlT treatment

A previous study about the response of different Andean and Mesoamerican common-bean cultivars to AlT showed that Andean genotypes are more tolerant to this abiotic stress, as compared to Mesoamerican genotypes . Our phylogenetic analysis revealed that all the Andean genotypes present a deleted version of the MIR1511 that would result in the absence of functional mature miR1511 . Previous work from our group showed that common-bean miR1511 expression responds to AlT stress . Here we analyzed the regulation of miR1511 and ALS3, as well as the early effects of AlT in roots of common-bean plants from the Mesoamerican BAT93 genotype vs. Andean G19833 genotype, with a deleted MIR1511 . Common-bean plantlets from BAT93 and G19833 genotypes were grown in hydroponic conditions either in control or AlT treatments, for up to 48 hrs. First, we performed the expression analysis of miR1511 and ALS3 target gene, using qRT-PCR . In AlT-stressed BAT93 plants, the transcript accumulation level of mature miR1511 gradually decreased, reaching more than half at 24 hours post-treatment , while at 48 hpt it returned to values close to those of time 0 . As expected, G19833 plants did not express mature miR1511 .The ALS3 transcript accumulation was significantly higher in G19833 roots, which lack miR1511, compared to BAT93 roots . At 6 hpt, ALS3 expression in G19833 roots almost doubled and remained unchanged up to 48 hpt, when transcript accumulation in BAT93 and G1988 roots reached similar levels . To further study the role of miR1511/ALS3 in the physiological reaction of common-bean plants to high Al levels, nft hydroponic system we aimed to over express the miR1511 precursor in transgenic roots.

As long as stable transformation of Phaseolus vulgaris plants is, to date, nearly impossible, we chose to use BAT93 and G19833 composite plants -with untransformed aerial organs and transgenic roots . As long as common bean is recalcitrant to stable transformation, this method is an alternative to demonstrate miRNA functionality . The miR1511-overexpressing composite plants as well as control plants, transformed with empty vector , were grown in AlT and control treatments. The expression level of miR1511 and ALS3 were determined by qRT-PCR in roots from composite plants harvested at 48 hpt . A two-fold accumulation of miR1511 transcript was observed in BAT93 OE1511 roots from plants grown in either treatment, compared to EV . In G19833 EV roots, the absence of miR1511 was confirmed, however a significant accumulation of miR1511 mature transcript was observed in OE1511 roots, albeit at lower levels than the level from BAT93 OEmiR1511 roots . In control treatment, both genotypes showed lower expression level of ALS3 in OEmiR1511 vs. EV roots. In addition, increased ALS3 transcript levels were observed in AlT stressed roots from both genotypes, as compared to control treatment . The primary and earliest symptoms of plants subjected to AlT stress is an inhibition of lateral root formation and root growth due to the alteration of root cell expansion and elongation, inhibiting cell division . On this basis, we analyzed the root architecture phenotype of BAT93 and G19833 OEmiR1511 and EV plants, grown under AlT or control treatments for 48 h . The growth rate of root length, width and area as well as the number of lateral roots, was calculated from the difference of each value at 48 hpt vs. time 0. The BAT93 EV plants under AlT showed decreased rates of each root parameter , thus indicating the drastic effect of high Al on root development. In contrast, G19833 EV plants showed higher tolerance to AlT evidenced by similar rate of the root length, area, width and lateral root number in stress vs control treatments .

These results are in agreement with those previously reported indicating a higher tolerance to AlT of Andean common-bean genotypes compared to Mesoamerican genotypes . Surprisingly, in G19833 plants genetically engineered for the expression of mature miR1511, the effect of root phenotype was evident. The rate of root length, area, width and lateral root number of G19833 OEmiR1511 AlT-stressed plants significantly decreased ascompared to EV plants, showing reduced levels similar to those from BAT93 stressed plants . In A. thaliana, primary root growth inhibition under phosphate limitation or AlT is mediated by ALS3 and LPR1, a ferroxidase . LPR1 acts downstream of ALS3 and its expression is epistatic to ALS3 expression . To determine if LPR1 could be involved in the different response to AlT of BAT93 vs. G19833 plants, we measured the accumulation of LPR1 transcripts in similar AlT conditions as those from Figure 4. The transcript level of LPR1 gene decreased in AlT treatment. In AlT BAT93 roots, the transcript level of LPR1 gradually decreased reaching half of the initial expression at 48 hpt. In AlT G19833 roots, the LPR1 expression was significantly lower compared to BAT93 roots from 6 hpt to 24 hpt . At 48 hpt, LPR1 transcript reached similar levels in roots from both genotypes . The LPR1 expression pattern was opposite to the ALS3 expression profile in AlT-stressed roots , indicating an epistatic relation between these two genes and the possible participation of LPR1 together with ALS3 in the control of common-bean root growth under AlT. In order to determine if miR1511 indirectly controls LPR1 expression via the regulation of ALS3 transcript, we evaluated the LPR1 transcripts accumulation in transgenic roots from OEmiR1511 and EV composite plants, growing in Alt vs control conditions. In both BAT93 and G19833 roots, a significant increase of LPR1 transcript accumulation was observed in OEmiR1511 roots from plants grown in either treatment, compared to EV roots . In AlT treatment, roots from both genotypes showed significant lower LPR1 transcript level compared to roots from control condition.

Again, LPR1 expression pattern was the opposite compared to that of ALS3 in the same transgenic root samples , thus indicating the probable epistatic relationship between these two genes and the indirect regulation of miR1511 on LPR1 expression. In plants, microRNA genes have a higher birth and death rates than protein-coding genes . For various authors, the miRNAs’ evolution rate generates a reservoir of adaptability for gene regulation . Due to this high evolutionary turnover rate, new miRNA families and members emerge, while others lose their regulatory role and disappear from genomes of phenotypically close species or genotypes. In soybean, MIR1511 is subjected to this mechanism. Htwe et al.,reported two altered versions of MIR1511 alleles in some annual wild soybean genotypes,hydroponic nft system whereas no deletion was found in G. max and perennial wild soybean MIR1511. Here, we report a similar phenomenon for P. vulgaris MIR1511 genotypic variations. Only part of the MW1 subgroup of P. vulgaris Mesoamerican genotypes and all the Andean genotypes analyzed displayed a 58 bp-deletion in the miR1511 precursor gene compared to the corresponding sequence of P. dumosus, P. coccineus, the PhI gene pool and the rest of P. vulgaris Mesoamerican genotypes . As MIR1511 is present in non-legume species, the most parsimonious hypothesis to explain the evolution process associated with this event is to consider a deletion of part of miR1511 precursor sequence. In contrast to soybean, where probably two deletion events were required for the generation of two alternative MIR1511 alleles, our results suggest a single deletion event in the common ancestor of a part of MW1 Mesoamerican subgroup and the Andean genotypes for the generation of a different allele of miR1511 precursor gene. This single MIR1511 deletion event hypothesis supports the Mesoamerican model proposed by Ariani and colleagues where the Mesoamerican gene pool is the ancestral population from which the other gene pools have derived. The fact that the PhI gene pool contains an untruncated version, as do the other closely-related Phaseolus species included in this analysis, further confirms the sister-species status of the PhI gene pool, now known as P. debouckii . P. debouckii also contains ancestral, i.e., non-derived, sequences for phaseolin seed protein and chloroplast DNA . Based on the MIR1511 phylogenetic history presented here , we propose an addendum to this model where AW gene pool genotypes derived from one, or more, member of the MW1 Mesoamerican subgroup. A clear distinct geographical distribution pattern was observed among the P. vulgaris genotypes featuring the MIR1511 deletion and the ones with an unaltered allele . MIR1511 deletion occurred in genotypes originating from the northern and southern extreme limits of the common-bean distribution in Latin American area. Such distribution pattern correlates with the annual precipitation pattern reported for the American continent , indicating that genotypes with MIR1511 deletion originated from areas with significantly less precipitation as compared to areas where genotypes with unaltered MIR1511 originated . Drought makes soil not suitable for agriculture; it tends to increase soil concentration of different compounds that would result in plant toxicity, including aluminum toxicity, which is an important plant growth-limiting factor . The harsh soil conditions of areas where P. vulgaris genotypes lacking of MIR1511 originated probably forced these common-bean populations to adapt and favored selection of genotypes with higher AlT tolerance. In this work, we showed the experimental validation of a target gene for P. vulgaris miR1511. We validated the miR1511-induce cleavage of ALS3 transcript, an ABC transporter participating in Al detoxification in plants . However, additional action of miR1511 by translation repression of ALS3 cannot be excluded. Other proposed target genes for P. vulgaris miR1511 are not related to plants AlT response and show high binding-site penalty score, thus improbable to be considered as functional in the AlT response. Here we provided evidence of the role of the miR1511/ALS3 node in the common-bean response to AlT .

We interpret that the MIR1511 deletion resulting in lack of mature miR1511 allowed common-bean adaptation to high Al in the soils by eliminating the negative regulation of ALS3 transcript and the accumulation of LPR1, in the first 48 hpt, thus increasing its tolerance to AlT and favoring plant growth. Interestingly, similar characteristics hold for the soybean MIR1511-deletion case where the origin of soybean genotypes featuring a MIR1511-altered allele is geographically correlated with areas susceptible to high Al concentration in soil due to presence of drought in these regions .High aluminum levels in soil mainly affect plant roots; aluminum can be allocated to different subcellular structures thus altering the growth of the principal root and the number of lateral roots . In this sense, it has been observed that AlT-stressed plants favor the transport of chelated Al to vacuoles and from roots, through the vasculature, to aerial tissues that are less sensitive to Al accumulation . In Arabidopsis and other plants, ALS1 and ALS3, from the ATP-binding cassette transporter family, are involved in Al detoxification and enhance tolerance to AlT . ALS3 is located in the tonoplast, the plasma membrane of root cortex epidermal cells, and in phloem cells throughout the plant . It has been shown that Arabidopsis als3 mutants are more sensitive to AlT exhibiting extreme root growth inhibition, compared to wild type plants . Recent studies on the role of Arabidopsis ALS3 in root growth inhibition revealed its regulation via the inhibition of the STOP1-ALMT1 and LPR1 pathways, which indirectly control ROS accumulation in roots via the modulation of Fe accumulation . Furthermore, Arabidopsis ALS3 expression is induced by excess Al , a phenomenon we observed in common-bean plants as well . Common-bean ALS3 expression doubled after 6 hours under AlT in roots from G19833 plants, while in stressed roots from BAT93 plants a similar level was reached only after 48 h of treatment . The opposite expression profile was found for the ALS3-epistatic gene LPR1, in the same samples . Our data on the different ALS3 and LPR1 expression level from both genotypes indicate that the absence of the negative regulator miR1511 in G19833 plants allows a faster response to AlT. Although the level of mature miR1511 decreased in BAT93 roots up to 24 h of after exposure to high Al, this level seems sufficient to induce degradation of ALS3 transcript, which showed reduced levels compared to G19833 roots, and an increase of LPR1 expression . Our analysis of root architecture in common-bean plants showed that G19833 Andean genotype plants are more tolerant to AlT as compared to Mesoamerican BAT93 plants . These data agree with those reported by Blair et al. .

From Water to Harvest: Exploring the Wonders of Hydroponic Agriculture

ABA is therefore necessary for the stomatal closure we observe in esb1-1. Te elevated ABA concentration we observe in leaves of esb1-1 compared to wild-type supports this conclusion. We also used the esb1-1sgn3-3 double mutant to test if SGN3 is involved in initiating this leaf ABA response. In leaves of the esb1-1sgn3-3 double mutant the elevated expression of a set of ABA signalling and response genes observed in esb1-1 is reduced to below that of wild-type . Further, the reduced stomatal aperture of esb1-1 is also recovered to wild-type levels in this double mutant . SGN3is therefore necessary for the ABA-dependent stomatal closure in response to the defective endodermal diffusion barrier in esb1-1. This raises the question of what links detection of a break in the endodermal diffusion barrier with ABA-driven closure of stomates in the leaf? Removal of endodermal suberin in esb1-1 expressing CDEF1 revealed a significant reduction in ABA-regulated gene expression, and a tendency to increasing stomatal aperture towards wild-type . Thus, increased suberin deposition in the endodermis of the esb1-1 root appears to play a partial role in the ABA controlled reduction in leaf transpiration. We have ruled out a role of local ABA signalling in controlling enhanced suberin deposition at the endodermis in esb1-1 . Using a similar strategy of expressing abi1 in the endodermis, in this case using the SCARECROW promoter , primarily active in the endodermis, we also show that in esb1-1 ABA signalling at the endodermis is not promoting stomatal closure or enhanced ABA signalling in leaves . We note that pSCR is also active in bundle sheath cell, and so ABA-signalling in these cells is also not involved in promoting stomatal closure in esb1-1. Furthermore,blueberry packaging containers enhanced ABA signalling in the endodermis is also not responsible for the initiation of the long-distance response of stomatal closure in leaves, and again it is more likely that suppression of ABA signalling is playing a role.

This can be seen in the fact that expression of abi1 in the endodermis, blocking ABA signalling, mimics the efect of esb1-1 on Lpr and stomatal aperture closure . However, these possibilities remain to be further explored. In contrast to these root-based or long-distance effects, the closure of stomata in leaves in response to a root-based CIFs/SGN3 derived signal is mediated by ABA locally in the leaves. We also note that the long distance signal connecting CIFs/SGN3 in roots with reduced leaf transpiration is currently unknown. Interestingly, a root-derived peptide has been recently identified as involved in long-distance signalling. In response to drought stress, CLE25 move from root to shoot and induces ABA accu-mulation in leaves and stomatal closure. Casparian strips have been suggested to play a critical role in forming a barrier to apoplastic diffusion to limit uncontrolled uptake and back fow of solutes from roots reviewed in . However, most Casparian strip mutants only appear to show fairly subtle phenotypic effects, and this has been a source of continued puzzlement. Here, we show that sensing damage to Casparian strips via leakage of the vasculature-derived CIF peptides from the stele into the cortex triggers a mechanism that inactivates aquaporins, promotes enhanced deposition of suberin limiting solute leakage in roots, and reduces transpiration in leaves, which all contribute to increasing solute concentration in the xylem . The overall outcome of this integrated response is a rebalancing of solute and water uptake and leakage. These physiological compensation mechanisms mitigate the loss of Casparian strip integrity, allowing relatively normal growth and development. A key part of this compensation mechanism is the ability of esb1-1 to limit water loss by the shoot by reducing stomatal aperture, in an ABA-dependent manner. This is clearly established by our observation that the esb1-1aba1 double mutant has severely reduced growth and seed production compared to either of the single mutants, and these growth defects can be partially supressed by the exogenous application of ABA .

The mechanisms we have identified are triggered by the loss of Casparian strips integrity. Such an event can occur during biotic stress including root nematodes infestation, and also during developmental processes such as lateral root emergence where Casparian strips are remodelled, suberin deposition occurs, and aquaporin expression is suppressed. Here, we describe novel outputs of the CIFs/SGN3 surveillance system that couple sensing of the integrity of the Casparian strip-based apoplastic diffusion barrier at the endodermis with pathways that regulate both solute leakage and hydraulic conductivity in the root . Long distance signals then connect these root-based responses with compensatory mechanisms in leaves which are mediated by local ABA signalling . Our dis-coveries provide a new framework which integrates our emerging understanding of the molecular development of the Casparian strip and suberin diffusion barriers with two of the major physiological functions required for plant survival – solute and water uptake.In recent years, California has tightened rules for reporting diversions of water for agriculture and other uses. One key challenge has been establishing workable standards for the collection of reliable data on relatively small and remote diversions — such as those for far-flung farms and ranches. Under new legislation, a certification program run by UC Cooperative Extension is helping to solve that problem. The State Water Resources Control Board views ac-curate diversion reporting as a key element of sound water management. “It’s incredibly important to monitor how much water comes into and goes out of the system,” says Kyle Ochenduszko, chief of water rights enforcement at the water board. Diversion reports are fed into a state database and support the orderly allocation of water resources by, for instance, enabling the board’s Division of Water Rights to inform water users when new requests to appropriate water might affect their own supply. Since 1966, the California Water Code has required diverters of surface water, with certain exceptions, to report their diversions to the water board. But in part because the water board lacked fining authority for many years, compliance was poor. In 2009, Senate Bill 8 gave the water board the authority to fine non-compliant diverters an initial $1,000, plus $500 for each additional day of failing to report.

Even so, SB 8 did not stipulate precisely how diversions were to be monitored. Rather, it required diverters to measure their diversions using the “best available technologies and best professional practices,” unless they could demonstrate that such technologies and practices were not locally cost-effective. That is, the requirement left wide latitude for interpretation. So things remained until 2015 — when Senate Bill 88 became law. This piece of legislation, passed amid a historically severe drought, directed the water board to draw up emergency regulations regarding water diversions. The regulations, once completed, required diverters of at least 100 acre-feet of water per year to hire an engineer or appropriately licensed contractor to install all monitoring devices. Now the requirements were clear. But the provision mandating installation by an engineer or contractor prompted an outcry from many smaller diverters, particularly those in remote areas of the state. For most diverters near sizable towns — Redding, say — complying with the regulations was manage-able, with expenses limited to the cost of a monitoring device and the services of an installer. But diverters in remote parts of Modoc County, for example, were looking at bigger bills, says Kirk Wilbur of the California Cattlemen’s Association. For such diverters, compliance might require importing an engineer or contractor from far away,blueberry packaging boxes which would entail significant travel expenses. If a site lacked electricity, as many do, the costs would pile higher . So how to reconcile the interests of the state’s diverters with those of the state? How best to balance the public and the private good? The answer, it turned out, was to empower diverters to install their own monitoring devices — with UCCE playing the empowering role. The idea originated with the Shasta County Cattlemen’s Association. It gained the support of the statewide Cattlemen’s Association. It took shape as proposed legislation in 2017 and was shepherded through the Legislature by Assemblyman Frank Bigelow . It breezed through both chambers with no votes in opposition — not even in committee. “All parties realized,” says Assemblyman Bigelow, “that Assembly Bill 589 would cut compliance costs and, as a result, increase compliance rates — which benefited both the regulators and the regulated community.” Essentially, AB 589 allows water diverters to in-stall their own monitoring devices if they successfully complete a monitoring workshop offered by UCCE. Further, it directed UCCE to develop the workshop in coordination with the water board. Khaled Bali, an irrigation water management specialist at the Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center, took the lead in drafting the coursework. “Then we met with the [water] board and got feedback,” Bali says. “We made changes until they said, ‘This looks good.’” Attendees at the workshops, which last three and a half hours, gain a solid foundation in the basic principles of diversion monitoring.

They learn how to monitor flows passing through a ditch, over a weir or through a pipe — or gathering in a pond. They learn how to build or install measuring devices appropriate for each type of diversion and how to calibrate those devices to comply with the state’s accuracy requirements. They learn how to navigate the water board’s rather detailed reporting system. Equipment for monitoring flows through open ditches might be limited to a tape measure, a timing device and a floating object. Installing a monitoring device for a diversion routed over a weir — a simple dam with an edge or notch that allows overflow — re-quires a bit more equipment. But once the installation is complete, the diverter need only read a staff gauge that shows the height of the water spilling over the weir’s crest . Diversions flowing through pipes must be outfitted with flow meters. Diversions feeding into a pond or reservoir can be monitored by tracking the depth of the water with a staff gauge, float or pressure transducer . So far, UCCE has offered the course in about 15 lo-cations, from Yreka to Bakersfield. According to Shasta County UCCE County Director Larry Forero — who teaches the $25 course along with Bali, Tehama County UCCE Advisor Allan Fulton and UC Davis–based UCCE Specialist Daniele Zaccaria — about 1,000 people had earned certificates of completion by early October. Even farmers and ranchers who divert less than 100 acre-feet per year are attending. “I’ve been floored,” says Wilbur, “by the number of diverters who have attended the course even though they aren’t required to — they want to better understand the regulations and make sure they’re doing the right thing.” It probably helps that the registration fee is a fraction of the cost of importing a faraway engineer. Due to their increasing use in a wide variety of beneficial industrial and consumer applications, ranging from use as a fuel catalyst, to chemical and mechanical planarization media, there have been increasing concerns about the potential environmental health and safety aspects of manufactured ceria nanomaterials.1,2 Ce is among the most abundant of the rare earth elements making up approximately 0.0046% of the Earth’s crust by weight .3 For example, Ce concentration in soils range from 2 to 150 mg kg−1 . 4 In Europe, the median concentrations of Ce were 48.2 mg kg−1 in soils, 66.6 mg kg−1 in sediment and 55 ng l−1 in water . There are many naturally occurring Ce containing minerals include rhabdophane, allanite, cerite, cerianite, samarskite, zircon, monazite and bastnasite.The existence of naturally occur-ring ceria nanoparticles is also likely and may play a key rolein controlling dissolved Ce concentrations,6 but precisely how the properties of naturally occurring ceria nanoparticles com-pare to manufactured ceria nanomaterials is unclear. There is concern that nanoceria, due to its small particle size and enhanced reactivity by design, may present unique hazards to ecological receptor species. Of critical importance are the redox properties of ceria which enables it to transition between CeIJIII and Ce, which are the key to understanding its potential toxicity.While there has been somewhat extensive investigation into the mammalian toxicity of ceria ,based on the present review, there has been considerably less effort invested into investigation of the environmental fate and effects of nanoceria. In this critical review, we discuss the likely points of environmental release along product life-cycles and resulting environmental exposure to nanoceria, methods of detection in the environment, fate and transport, as well as the available toxicity literature for ecological receptor species.

Each block has an agricultural office that is led by a Block Agricultural Officer

None of these studies consider whether engaging the supply side of the market can increase adoption by farmers. Survey data in agriculture suggest that input suppliers act as the second most popular source of information for Indian farmers. Informing private input suppliers about technological benefits is one way to take advantage of their intrinsic motivation to spread information. Yet, it has not been looked at as source of potential information agents with well-aligned incentives in promoting the adoption of new technologies. Our paper is the first to implement and test this as a new approach to doing agricultural extension.The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives more background information on the setting and outlines the experiment. Section 3 describes the data collection. Section 4 presents the main results on how targeting agricultural extension to input dealers increases technology adoption by farmers, particularly those with the highest potential benefit. Section 5 turns to analyzing a potential explanation for this result. Particularly, it focuses on whether dealers spread information to their customers and what motivates them to do so. Section 6 concludes. This section starts by providing background information on the standard methods used in agricultural extension. It also gives a description of how the public sector delivers information to farmers in our particular study area. We then outline the design of our main experiment to compare these standard methods with the more business-oriented approach of using agrodealers as information agents. Governments all over the world support agricultural extension services as a mode of information delivery. Ministries of agriculture typically have entire departments dedicated to providing these services. These departments oversee local administrative offices that hire front line extension agents whose role is to diffuse information about new agricultural technologies and practices to farmers.

The specific techniques used by agents vary across contexts, but the basic methods are largely consistent,indoor garden especially in poor countries. Agents usually work with selected “contact farmers” who are keen on trying new approaches and are ideally able to transmit knowledge to others in their social networks. They also organize farmer field days with cluster demonstration plots, where new seeds are grown by multiple farmers, to boost the diffusion of information. The public sector provides agricultural extension services for at least two reasons. First, markets do not exist for many new innovations. For instance, a new planting method may only be promoted by government agents because there is no scope for profiting from its sale in private markets. This contrasts with new seed varieties or material inputs that are produced and sometimes marketed by private firms. Second, many agricultural innovations are not developed, and hence not marketed, by private firms. Public entities such as national agricultural research systems or international research organizations frequently develop new seeds, inputs, and agricultural management practices. The public extension service then transmits information about these developments to farmers. In the context of our experiment, agricultural extension workers use many of these standard techniques. Each of the 10 districts in the sample is organized into blocks, where a block has an average of 135 villages.The BAO employs Assistant Agricultural Officers and Village Agricultural Workers who work in the field with farmers. Our sample consists of 72 blocks in 10 flood-prone districts of Odisha.We selected these areas because the technology being promoted — a flood-tolerant rice variety called Swarna-Sub1 — is most suitable for flood-affected areas.

The blocks in the sample represent around 20 percent of the blocks in the state. We randomly assigned 36 of these blocks to the treatment group where agrodealers were targeted to receive seeds and information. This randomization was stratified by district. The remaining 36 blocks serve as a comparison group where we supported the government extension service to carry out normal extension activities. Figure 1 displays the timeline of these interventions. Starting in May 2016 — about 6-8 weeks before planting time — we partnered with the government’s extension service to introduce Swarna-Sub1 into control blocks. We did this in a way that mirrors three common practices in agricultural extension. First, field staff provided 10 seed minikits of 5 kilograms each to the BAO, who then helped identify contact farmers to use the kits. The BAO chose 2 villages and 5 farmers in each village. Each kit contained only seeds for testing and some basic information about Swarna-Sub1. Our field staff then delivered the kits to the recommended farmers. Second, we provided another 150 kg of seeds to the BAO so that he could set up a cluster demonstration where the seeds would be used by several farmers on a contiguous set of plots. Based on seeding rates in the region, 150 kg allows for cultivation of 5-10 acres. The BAO chose where to do the demonstration and which farmers to target. Official government guidelines for organizing these clusters suggest that they be carried out in sites that are easily accessible to be viewed by many farmers. Moreover, sites should be representative of average conditions in the area. Third, we helped the BAO carry out a farmer field day in November — at the time right before harvest. The BAO selected the location of the field day and whom to invite. The purpose of the field day was for extension staff to train farmers about Swarna-Sub1, share information from the demonstrations, and hope that information will spread throughout the block. The objective of such an active control group is twofold. First, it ensures that each block is endowed with the same quantity of seeds. Therefore, the dealer-based treatment only differs on who received the new seeds and information. Second, the demonstrations and partnerships with contact farmers may not have taken place without our involvement. Forcing these activities to happen makes the treatment-control comparison more meaningful. Most importantly, it sets a higher bar for the dealer-based treatment by eliminating any possibility that the new technology would not be promoted by the government extension service.

Turning to the 36 treatment blocks, we obtained a list of 2,087 seed suppliers from the state Department of Agriculture. These include suppliers of two types: private seed dealers and Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies . PACS are farmer groups that handle credit, seed supply, and procurement of output for farmers. We did not include them in the intervention because their incentives are not the same as those of private dealers. Seed sales are usually handled by a member that is not the residual claimant on any profits from the sale. Despite being fewer in number relative to PACS, private dealers account for almost 60 percent of the seeds sold to farmers. The sample consists of 666 private dealers, 327 of which were located in the treatment blocks. Armed with this list, our field staff entered each treatment block and located five dealers interested in receiving seed minikits and an informational pamphlet about SwarnaSub1. In some blocks fewer than 5 dealers were available. We provided additional seed to each dealer in these cases to guarantee that a full 200 kilograms were introduced. The list provided by the Department of Agriculture did not have enough locatable dealers in some cases. In these circumstances, our field staff provided the seeds to other local agrodealers.Overall, seeds and information were provided to 151 dealers across the 36 treatment blocks.119 of these were from the original list. Once provided with seeds and information, the dealers were left alone to decide how to use them. We asked dealers about their intended uses. They overwhelmingly stated that they would use the seeds for testing on their own farms and would provide them to good customers for testing.Our intervention did not include any additional assistance to dealers. This differs from standard methods in agricultural extension where agents continually revisit their contact farmers. We allowed dealers to learn on their own because in theory they should be motivated to learn about a new product that could enhance their business. The goal of our treatment is to measure whether this motivation causes information to flow to farmers and ultimately increases adoption. Not intervening further ensures that our treatment effect is driven by any real-world incentives dealers have to learn, rather than heavy monitoring by our partners. Dealers in our sample are small business entrepreneurs. Some operate out of their homes, while others maintain shops in rural towns. 44 percent of dealers sell only seeds,hydroponic farming with fertilizers and pesticides being the most common inputs sold by the other dealers. Dealers are highly local. The median dealer sells enough rice seed to cover roughly 400 acres, which amounts to the rice area cultivated by 150 farmers.Importantly, dealers tend to serve the same customers from year to year. Another important feature of our context is that 84% of the seeds sold by dealers in our sample are produced by the state-run Odisha State Seed Corporation . Government subsidies explain this. Seeds produced by the state are subsidized at a rate of approximately 40 percent. No subsidies exist for seeds produced by private companies. As licensed agents, dealers receive a fixed commission that amounts to about 8 percent of the pre-subsidy price. All varieties have the same final price for farmers. Thus, the margin for dealers is the same across all types of varieties. Hence dealers have no direct financial incentive to sell one variety over another. Turning to the second season , we ran an SMS messaging experiment to compare our intervention with this “lighter touch” information treatment.

The random delivery of SMS messages allows us to test whether our dealer treatment substitutes basic knowledge that can be easily transmitted via ICT technology. Furthermore, it allows us to compare the direct effects of the two approaches. The messaging was simple. It informed farmers that Swarna-Sub1 is a new variety that is suitable for medium-low land in terms of elevation, matures in 145 days, and can tolerate up to two weeks of flooding. The message also stated that it was being produced by OSSC and could be available at local dealers. As a sampling frame, we obtained mobile numbers for 75,616 farmers that had registered for the state government’s Direct Benefit Transfer scheme to obtain seed subsidies.These farmers are located across the 261 gram panchayats that cover our main estimation sample, as outlined below. The SMS treatment was randomized at the gram panchayat level, resulting in messages being delivered to 37,783 of the names on the list.We anticipated that dealers and contact farmers would use the demonstration minikits for learning in 2016 and any possible treatment effects could first be detected during year two . Our main followup survey therefore took place in August-September 2017 — around 15 months after the interventions. Its purpose was to measure adoption of seed varieties by rice farmers. To minimize measurement error, we timed the survey to be right after planting. Our sample consists of 7,200 farmers. These farmers were drawn from a random sample of 261 gram panchayats — an administrative unit usually consisting of around 8 villages.Before drawing this sample, we excluded gram panchayats that had any village within 1.5 kilometers of the block boundary.We removed these areas to reduce any interference caused by farmers possibly obtaining seeds from other blocks. The 261 sample gram panchayats had 75,616 farmers registered for the DBT program for seed subsidies. Using this database as a sampling frame, we randomly drew 100 farmers from each block . These farmers are spread across 1,333 villages. Figure A1 shows their geographic dispersion across the 10 districts in the experiment. Survey teams succeeded in locating and surveying 6,653 of the farmers. Of these, 93 percent were currently cultivating rice. Table A1 shows no significant differences in the probabilities of being surveyed or growing rice between treatment and control groups. The survey focused on which seed varieties were currently being used for rice cultivation. Surveyors went through a list of 30 varieties and asked farmers which ones they were currently using and the amount of land being grown.In addition to these adoption data, we obtained information on contacts with agricultural extension agents during the last year, topics discussed during these conversations, whether the farmer had seen any seed demonstrations, and whether they had recently learned about Swarna-Sub1.

Agriculture plays a central role in many important and influential hypotheses about human history

Greater effective soil age in little-eroded uplands soils means a longer time for the accumulation of recalcitrant organic matter in older soils—and probably more importantly, it allows the accumulation of noncrystalline minerals that stabilize soil organic matter.We further suggest that the patterns for total P are more complex because its pools reflect both weathering and loss and retention by both organic matter and mineral adsorption, which are greater in the upland slope positions.Overall, these results illustrate that erosion and deposition have a rejuvenating effect on the supply of rock-derived nutrients in these valley landscapes —one that suffices to make both lower slope and alluvial soils fertile enough to support intensive pre-contact agricultural systems in both valleys despite the infertility of the upland soils surrounding them.However,differences in the structures of the valleys influenced their ability to support intensive agriculture prior to European contact.Halawa Valley and other large valleys on older islands have well-developed colluvial aprons surrounding their alluvial floors.In contrast, Pololu¯ Valley lacked the potential for lower-slope rainfed agriculture because the high subsidence rate of Hawai’i Island causes a sharp transition between slopes too steep to cultivate and the nearly flat valley floor —a process that is accentuated by the rapid glacial-melt-driven sea level rise of the past approximately 20 ky.Other major valleys on Kohala Volcano have similar structures—including the largest, Waipi’o Valley, which was a major center of precontact Hawaiian settlement.Considering only the area bounded by the cliff tops on the valley sides and waterfalls at the head of the valleys,flood and drain table differences in subsidence rates and corresponding in-fill histories cause large differences in the distribution of slopes suitable for agriculture within Pololu¯ and Halawa.

Assuming that slopes of less than 5 could have been made suitable for intensive pond field systems, 17% of the 423 ha surface of Pololu¯ Valley could support pond fields ; only 6% of the 692 ha surface of Halawa Valley had slopes less than 5.Further, assuming that 12 represents an upper threshold for intensive rainfed agriculture, 16% of Halawa Valley has slopes between 5 and 12 , as opposed to only 5% of Pololu¯ Valley.Available archaeological evidence for pre-contact agricultural systems in Pololu¯ and Halawa is consistent with our findings on valley topography and soil fertility.Tuggle and Tomonari-Tuggle found evidence for both irrigated and rainfed fields on the flat alluvial floor of Pololu¯.They attribute the fact that not all the Pololu¯ alluvium was irrigated to the valley’s hydrologic conditions; the valley floor is so large relative to its watershed area that stream flow was inadequate to have watered the entire valley floor.In Halawa Valley, the entire area of alluvium was converted to irrigated pond fields, which also extended onto the lower colluvial slopes.More importantly, well-defined rainfed cultivation plots with stone-faced terraces and walls extend well up the colluvial slopes in Halawa, encompassing an area greater than the total area of irrigated pond fields there.Rosendahl mapped the Kapana area of Halawa Valley, providing a detailed example of intensive rainfed agricultural terraces, integrated with habitation sites and small temples.Significantly, mid-nineteenth century land records from Halawa demonstrate that most claimants included both irrigated as well as rainfed areas in their claims , showing that the two kinds of agriculture were integral parts of the overall production system at the household level.The broader implications of this potential for intensive rainfed agriculture on colluvial slopes of the valleys on the older islands in the Hawaiian Archipelago are substantial.Analyses of the distribution of intensive agricultural systems and their consequences for the dynamics of Hawaiian society have considered irrigated and rainfed systems to have been spatially separated, due to the very different ecosystem and landscape properties that favor their development.

Because these types of agricultural systems differ both in their ability to produce a surplus over agricultural labor and in their vulnerability to drought—with both comparisons favoring the irrigated pond field systems—these contrasting systems could have contributed to the development of rather different societies, in areas or on islands dominated by one system or the other.The islands of Hawai’i and to a lesser extent Maui were based largely upon intensive rainfed systems, with only a few well-watered irrigated valleys.In contrast, the older islands in the archipelago have been thought to be based mostly upon irrigated pond field systems.However, the evidence here suggests that the older islands likely maintained integrated pond- field/rainfed systems and that, as in Halawa Valley, the peripheral rainfed systems could have covered a larger area than did irrigated pond fields.A similar pattern has been suggested in the leeward Makaha Valley of O’ahu, where archaeological survey confirmed the presence of extensive areas of dryland gardening on colluvial slopes, but where irrigation was confined to smaller areas in the valley interior.The potential for developing integrated pond- field/rainfed systems on colluvial slopes on the older islands strengthens the contrast between the agricultural production potential of Hawai’i Island versus the older islands.It has been suggested that pressures to maintain surplus production in rainfed, drought-prone agricultural areas could have driven the elites of Hawai’i Island towards marriage alliances with elites of the older islands, and/or towards conquest of those islands —and the development of integrated pond field/rainfed systems on the older islands would only have increased their attractiveness as potential acquisitions.Moreover, integrated systems on the older islands could have boosted their potential agricultural yields, and the diversity of foods they could produce, to levels approaching the total productivity of the much larger island of Hawai’i.These dynamics should be incorporated into our understanding of the dynamics of Hawaiian society, and those of other indigenous societies in which similar dynamics could occur.For the vast majority of our evolutionary history, humans subsisted by hunting animals and gathering plants.

Around 12,000 years ago, we began to take a more direct role in the process of food production, domesticating animals and cultivating crops in order to meet our nutritional requirements.This subsistence revolution is thought to have occurred independently in a limited number of places.This new way of life is arguably the most important process in human history, and its dramatic consequences have set the scene for the world we live in today.Agricultural productivity, and its variation in space and time, plays a fundamental role in many theories of human social evolution, yet we often lack systematic information about the productivity of past agricultural systems on a scale large enough to test these theories properly.Here, we outline how explicit crop yield models can be combined with high quality historical and archaeological information about past societies in order to infer how agricultural productivity and potential have changed temporally and geographically.The paper has the following structure: First, we introduce the ways in which agriculture is involved in theories about human social evolution, and stress the need to scientifically test between competing hypotheses.Second, we outline what information we need to model about past agricultural systems and how potential agricultural productivity and carrying capacity can provide a useful way of comparing societies in different regions and time periods.Third, we discuss the need for a systematic, comparative framework for collecting data about past societies.We introduce a new databank initiative we have developed for collating the best available historical and archaeological evidence.We discuss the kinds of coded information we are collecting about agricultural techniques and practices in order to inform our modelling efforts.We illustrate this task by presenting three short case studies summarizing what is known about agricultural systems in three different regions at various time periods.We discuss the challenges confronting this approach, and the various limitations and caveats that apply to the task at hand.Fourth, we outline how we can combine a statistical approach of modelling past crop productivity based on climate inputs with the kind of historical information we are collecting.The development of agriculture and the ways it has spread and intensified are fundamental to our understanding of the human past.For example, authors such as Renfrew, Bellwood, and Diamond argue that early agricultural societies enjoyed a demographic advantage over hunter-gatherers, which fueled a series of population expansions resulting in agriculturalists spreading out to cover much of the world, taking their culture and languages along with them.At the beginning of the European age of exploration, agricultural societies had pushed the distribution of forager populations in the Old World to only those places that were marginal for agriculture.

Widespread forager populations were present in the Americas and Australia, but these too eventually gave way to agricultural populations of European origin.Agriculture raised the carrying capacity of the regions in which it developed and spread,rolling bench leading to people living at higher densities with a more sedentary way-of-life than was previously possible.However, the development of agriculture did not stop there.Further improvements in agricultural technologies and techniques, and processes such as artificial selection further raised the productivity of agriculture and the size of the population that could be supported in any one region.These improvements ultimately enabled humans to live in large urban conglomerations with extremely high population densities.Influential models of agricultural innovation, starting with the work of Esther Boserup , argue that advances occur in response to increases in population, and the subsequent decreasing availability of land.This drives farmers to invest more labor in producing food.In other words, there is feedback in the system that leads to the increasing intensification of agriculture.These processes of intensification, whatever their cause, can occur in a number of different ways and have had important consequences.From the fields and hedgerows of Northern Europe to the mountainside rice terraces of the Ifugao of the Philippines , through to the deforested slopes of Easter Island , agricultural populations have dramatically altered the landscapes around them.Agriculture is central to many theories about how larger-scale complex societies evolved.Under functionalist views of social complexity more productive agricultural systems allowed for ‘surplus’ production, and enabled a more extensive division of labor.This surplus production allowed for individuals who did not grow their own food, enabling the creation of specialized managers and rulers, and occupational artists and artisans.It is argued that this division of labor increases efficiency and coordination, enabling more complex societies to out-compete less complex societies either directly or indirectly.Under this view, not only is a rich resource base a necessary condition for the emergence of complex societies, but it is also a sufficient one.If this is correct, it follows that differences in agricultural productivity can explain why some regions developed more complex societies than others.Changes in agricultural intensity have also been linked to changes in the ritual and religious life of human groups.It is argued that hunter-gathers and early agriculturalists, who lived in small groups and faced high risks from hunting of large animals, tended to participate in dysphoric, “imagistic” rituals that, although rarely experienced, are typically emotionally intense.Such rituals act as a mechanism for creating social cohesion via ‘identity fusion’.A greater dependence on agriculture led to increased group sizes, and required different forms of cooperation and coordination in order to successfully produce food.New ritual forms developed that were organized around daily or weekly cycles but with less intense emotional experiences.It is argued that this ‘routinization’ enabled strangers to recognize and identify with others as members of a common in-group, enabling trust and cooperation on a hitherto unknown scale.It is clear that agriculture is of fundamental importance to studies of the human past.The ideas outlined above represent just a flavor of the ways agriculture and agricultural productivity enter into our understanding of the long-term patterns and processes of human history.

Importantly, these ideas are hypotheses that require testing against other plausible narratives.For example, it has been argued that an important factor driving the evolution of complex societies was intensive forms of conflict between nomadic pastoralists and settled agrarian societies that selected for increasingly larger and more cohesive societies.Thus, complex societies tended to emerge on the border of the Eurasian Steppe and spread out from there.Under this view, agriculture is seen as necessary but not sufficient to explain the observed variation about where and when such societies developed.When attempting to understand the past we should seek to test between competing hypotheses, rather than simply focusing on a single favored idea.In order to do this, it is important to have relevant data on past agricultural systems and their productivity and potential.These systems exhibit a great deal of variation, and are of varying levels of intensity.To enable more direct comparisons across different regions and time periods, it will be important to have explicit models that translate different agricultural systems across space and time into a common currency.This will allow us to perform statistical analyses so that we can directly test alternative hypotheses.

Some specimens could only be identified to the family level

Since its colonial introduction to the Old World, the golden berry also has been referred to as the cape gooseberry; however, Physalis peruviana from South America is marketed in the United States most commonly as golden berry and sometimes Picchu berry, named after Machu Picchu in order to associate the fruit with its origin in Peru and to address the fact that this fruit is not actually a gooseberry as the name cape gooseberry implies. As a member of the plant family Solanaceae, it is closely related to the tomatillo . High in Vitamins A, B, and C, as well as phosphorus and protein, golden berries also have a range of documented medicinal uses, including antitussive, antihelmintic, antidiabetic, and diuretic properites; they are also used to combat a range of maladies from eczema to conjunctivitis to gonorrhea . Recent studies have discovered 14 new compounds in various species of wild tomatillo that have anti-cancer properties; these compounds, known as withanolides, are already showing promise in combating a number of different cancers and tumors without noticeable side effects or toxicity . Passion fruit/maracuyáis a woody perennial climbing vine that originated in Brazil and then spread throughout South America. Cultivated in humid and dry climates, passion fruits can be grown up to 1,500 masl, but require non-flooded land with good drainage to produce successfully. Both the fruit pulp and seeds of this sweet fruit are consumed as desserts, and the fruits are also squeezed into juices and made into salsas. Similar to cotton, passion fruits can be pressed for oil, which is used to aid digestion. Passion fruits also possess magical and medicinal properties; they are used an as anaphrodisiac , as well as a muscle relaxer and sedative . Cactus fruits of the genus Opuntia are abundant in the Moche Valley today; this plant grows between 500 and 3,000 masl in interandean valleys and survives in soil with low to medium soil fertility. The pulp of the cactus fruit is consumed also has a variety of other uses, including medicinal ; cosmetic ; to attract cochineal insects used for dyes; and as fodder for livestock .

In addition, various wild plum or wild cherry/cerezospecies are distributed throughout Peru, wild and cultivated up to 3,500 masl, with known comestible and medicinal uses .A number of other miscellaneous/wild taxa were identified in the assemblages,vertical grow rack including various weedy taxa found in agricultural fields and on habitation sites, many of which have known economic uses . Others likely represent incidental inclusions, unintentionally transported to the site in the clothing of family members and fur of livestock returning from agricultural fields. In contrast to field cultigens and tree crops that produce large seeds or rind fragments, many of the miscellaneous/wild species discussed below have not received much treatment in the Andean archaeological literature. Only in the past few decades have paleoethnobotanists made attempts to systematically identify small weedy seeds from archaeological samples , in contrast to the recovery of larger taxa hand-picked during excavation or from larger mesh/screen sizes that characterize earlier excavation techniques.Some of these families are represented by multiple genera and hundreds of species, so it is difficult to make specific inferences about their economic uses by Moche Valley residents. Some of these families are well adapted to disturbed environments and occupy agricultural fields , in open uncultivated areas , or on rocky hill slopes or other relatively undisturbed areas . Other species identified to the species or genus level have well-documented economic uses, with data from ethnographic studies and some have longer histories of use evidenced archaeologically. Many of the taxa discussed below had multiple uses, including as food, medicine, fodder, fuel, or other purposes, with different portions of plants used for different purposes, including with different preparation methods . I draw primarily on ethnobotanical uses discussed by Brack Egg , along with other scholars cited below. Food taxa in the miscellaneous/wild category include amaranth/kiwicha 17, lupine/tarwi , mesquite/algorrobo , plantain/Plantago spp., oregano , purslane/verdolaga , rattlepod/crotalaria , saltbush/orache , sow thistle , trianthema , vetch/haba , wildbean and a member of the genus Rubus. Some of these comestibles are fairly well known; for example, amaranth is fairly cosmopolitan in cuisine, as a nutritious grain that can be toasted, popped, ground into flour, or boiled for gruel . Native to Peru, amaranth is distributed throughout the Andes from Colombia to Argentina, on the on the coast, highlands , and high jungle.

Both wild and cultivated , different species of amaranths grow within different elevation zones, with coastal varieties that can be grown up to 500 masl and altiplano varieties up to 4000 masl . Brack Egg lists two wild species that can be grown in the north coast region . Amaranth has long been used as a food source in the Andes, including by the Inka , with archaeological evidence of cultivation going back as far as 2,000 years, recovered in tombs in northwestern Argentina . It is also used as livestock fodder and has medicinal uses, including to treat diarrhea, sore throats, menstrual cramps, and rashes. The green leaves also be can be eaten like vegetables . Mesquite, or algarrobo , is another well-known food; ripened seed-pods are often ground into flour and also used to make chicha. The seed pods also serve as camelid fodder. The sweet, molasses-like flavor of mesquite is incorporated into many beverages in Peru today, including algarrobina, a cocktail that uses mesquite syrup extract. Thriving in alluvial and rocky soils up to 1,500 masl, mesquite trees grow quickly and are long-lived . Their hardwoods are a source of long-burning firewood and charcoal as well as a raw material for wooden tools . The leaves, greens, and seeds of many of the miscellaneous/wild taxa may have been eaten raw or cooked, including lupine, plantain, purslane, saltbush, rattlepod, Rubus spp., sow thistle, vetch, and wildbean, while others were used as seasoning or condiments, such as oregano or trianthema . Some of these taxa have moderate to high degrees of toxicity and must be processed, e.g., lupine, which has a high alkaloid content. A member of the Fabaceae family, lupine, or tarwi, is typically considered to be a ‘highland’ food, as it grows up to 3,850 masl . A number of the miscellaneous/wild taxa have known medicinal uses as well, including acacia/faique , amaranth, knotweed/smartweed , milk thistle/cardo , oregano, purslane, ragweed/ambrosía , rattlepod, saltbush, sedge/piri-piri , spurge , tillandsia/achupalla , sage/salvia , shoreline purslane/capin , sida/pichana , vervain/verbenaand violet/violeta .

These plants have known analgesic properties and been documented for the their use in treating a range of maladies, from coughs/colds, headaches/earaches/throat aches, gastrointestinal distress, rashes, and menstrual cramps, among others, and also have been used in fertility management as contraceptives or abortive agents . Certain taxa, e.g., vervain, have known uses in veterinary medicine as well; used to treat cattle hooves in the Andes today , it is possible that vervain could have been used to treat prehistoric ungulates . Certain spurges that have known purgative properties, along with sedges that have aphrodisiac properties have documented uses in shamanic rituals as well . Some of the miscellaneous/wild taxa also have known fuel uses, including tillandsia, saltbush, mesquite, and acacia. A few archaeological studies have identified plant taxa and other organic materials including woods and other herbaceous plants used as prehistoric fuels on the north coast , for cooking, firing ceramics, and working metal. In Inka times, fuel was an important tribute item . Beyond potential inventories of north coast fuels, the social relations associated with fuel use remain poorly understood. Moche Valley residents likely burned dung as a source of fuel in addition to grasses and tree fuels . In order to identify dung burning archaeologically, Wright suggests that researchers consider the following: if there is a basis for using dung such as a shortage of available wood, the presence of suitable dung-producing animals in the archaeological context considered, recognizable animal dung in the archaeological deposits,vertical grow table and the recovery of such samples from hearth contexts . No wood analysis was conducted in this dissertation, so it is difficult to say at this point if there was a shortage of any particular taxa in the Moche Valley that would have been used for fuel. As discussed further below, seeds of the potential fuel taxa only were recovered in small quantities, but future wood charcoal analyses may reveal a different pattern. The Moche Valley does not have the dense stands of algarrobo trees witnessed in the more northerly Jequetepeque Valley ; I imagine that Moche Valley residents likely used a combination of gathered wild plant taxa and dung as fuel sources.

Camelids would have served as suitable dung-producing animals; indeed, ample amounts of dung, from camelids as well as guinea pigs, or cuy , were recovered throughout the Moche Origins Project excavations at MV-224, MV-225, and MV-83, and was present in many flotation samples . Hastorf and Wright and Miller and Smart argue that animal dung can serve as a vector for seeds from fodder plants, e.g., Poaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Verbenaceae, and Boraginaceae, taxa that were present in the Moche Valley assemblages. A number of the miscellaneous/wild taxa were likely used for animal fodder as well, including amaranth, grasses including crown grass/gramaloteand panic grass/grama , lupine, rattlepod, sandbur/pega pega , sida, tillandsia, trianthema, vetch, and wildbean. All of these taxa have ethnographically documented cases of fodder use for livestock . Brack Egg lists sida in particular as a fodder used for guinea pigs. However, as Wright identifies, separating taxa used for fodder from taxa used for human consumption is complicated. Fodder can often be the same species as food used for human consumption and may also be processed and stored in a similar fashion . Ethnographic data suggest that the boundary between food and fodder is flexible and often depends upon the success of the harvest. In other words, what might be fodder in one year, could be used for human consumption the next year if yields of more preferred foods are low. This distinction even relates to fodder and fuel; for example, the preferred economic use of tillandsia is as fuel, but it can also serve as a fallback fodder for animals . Finally, some of the miscellaneous/wild taxa have other technological uses, as construction materials, for matting/thatching , textile production, etc. Sage and field madder have documented uses as green/yellow or red dyes, respectively . Other taxa may simply be the result of incidental inclusions in the archaeobotanical assemblages, and may not have been used by Moche Valley residents. The archaeobotanical assemblages from the five Moche Valley sites include a combination of wild and cultivated plants, with ecological requirements in many cases involving anthropogenic intervention. Moche Valley farmers had sustained access to water from irrigation canals, resulting in the creation of a landscape of cultivated fields, orchards, and fallow pastures.

Aside from a wide range of field cultigens and tree crops , other fruits would have been actively managed, likely lining fields. A number of miscellaneous wild species thrive in areas disturbed by humans and likely existed and were harvested in gardens even if not intentionally grown. Certain economic weedy species thrive along irrigation canals ; in disturbed areas ; and in fields under cultivation or recently fallowed , presenting Moche Valley farmers with opportunities to collect them while managing farming tasks. Ethnographic and Ethnohistoric Perspectives of Food Preparation and Processing Some materials and techniques of processing and preparation of plant foods recorded in ethnohistoric documents and witnessed today may have some bearing on past practices. Many of the edible plants and animals listed in the inventories of prehistoric sites in Peru are still grown, purchased, or gathered today, and while I do not assume an unbroken continuity for two millennia regarding the ways in which foods were processed and prepared, ethnographic and ethnohistoric sources are a useful starting point for thinking about the organization of food ways. Throughout South America, the practices of baking in ovens or frying over fires were virtually unknown in prehispanic times . While much literature has focused on Inka or highland traditions rather than coastal valleys, a small amount of ethnographic and ethnohistoric information is available for the north coast region.

Well-curated GGB databases play an important role in the data lifecycle by facilitating dissemination and reuse

The AgBioData consortium was formed in 2015 in response to the need for GGB personnel to work together to come up with better, more efficient database solutions. The mission of the consortium, comprised of members responsible for over 25 GGB databases and allied resources, is to work together to identify ways to consolidate and standardize common GGB database operations to create database products with more interoperability. FAIR principles have rapidly become standard guidelines for proper data management, as they outline a road map to maximize data reuse across repositories. However, more specific guidelines on how to implement FAIR principles for agricultural GGB data are needed to assist and streamline implementation across GGB databases. The results were used to focus and foster the workshop discussions. Here we present the current challenges facing GGBs in each of these seven areas and recommendations for best practices, incorporating discussions from the Salt Lake City meeting and results of the survey. The purpose of this paper is 3-fold: first, to document the current challenges and opportunities of GGB databases and online resources regarding the collection, integration and provision of data in a standardized way; second, to outline a set of standards and best practices for GGB databases and their curators; and third, to inform policy and decision makers in the federal government, funding agencies, scientific publishers and academic institutions about the growing importance of scientific data curation and management to the research community. The paper is organized by the seven topics discussed at the Salt Lake City workshop. For each topic, we provide an overview, challenges and opportunities and recommendations. The acronym ‘API’ appears frequently in this paper, referring to the means by which software components communicate with each other: i.e. a set of instructions and data transfer protocols.

We envision this paper will be helpful to scientists in the GGB database community, publishers, funders and policy makers and agricultural scientists who want to broaden their understanding of FAIR data practices.Biocurators strive to present an accessible,ebb flow tray accurate and comprehensive representation of biological knowledge . Biocuration is the process of selecting and integrating biological knowledge, data and metadata within a structured database so that it can be accessible, understandable and reusable by the research community. Data and metadata are taken from peer-reviewed publications and other sources and integrated with other data to deliver a value-added product to the public for further research. Biocuration is a multidisciplinary effort that involves subject area experts, software developers, bio-informaticians and researchers. The curation process usually includes a mixture of manual, semi-automated and fully automated workflows. Manual biocuration is the process of an expert reading one or several related publications, assessing and/or validating the quality of the data and entering data manually into a database using curation tools, or by providing spreadsheets to the database manager. It also encompasses the curation of facts or knowledge, in addition to raw data; for example, the role a gene plays in a particular pathway. These data include information on genes, proteins, DNA or RNA sequences, pathways, mutant and nonmutant phenotypes, mutant interactions, qualitative and quantitative traits, genetic variation, diversity and population data, genetic stocks, genetic maps, chromosomal information, genetic markers and any other information from the publication that the curator deems valuable to the database consumers. Manual curation includes determining and attaching appropriate ontology and metadata annotations to data. This sometimes requires interaction with authors to ensure data is represented correctly and completely, and indeed to ask where the data resides if they are not linked to a publication. In well-funded large GGB databases, manually curated data may be reviewed by one, two or even three additional curators.

Manual biocuration is perhaps the best way to curate data, but no GGB database has enough resources to curate all data manually. Moreover, the number of papers produced by each research community continues to grow rapidly. Thus, semi-automated and fully automated workflows are also used by most databases. For example, a species-specific database may want to retrieve all Gene Ontology annotations for genes and proteins for their species from a multi-species database like UniProt . In this case, a script might be written and used to retrieve that data ‘en masse’. Prediction of gene homologs, orthologs and function can also be automated. Some of these standard automated processes require intervention at defined points from expert scientist to choose appropriate references, cut off values, perform verifications and do quality checks. All biocuration aims to add value to data. Harvesting biological data from published literature, linking it to existing data and adding it to a database enables researchers to access the integrated data and use it to advance scientific knowledge. The manual biocuration of genes, proteins and pathways in one or more species often leads to the development of algorithms and software tools that have wider applications and contribute to automated curation processes. For example, The Arabidopsis Information Resource has been manually adding GO annotations to thousands of Arabidopsis genes from the literature since 1999. This manual GO annotation is now the gold standard reference set for all other plant GO annotations and is used for inferring gene function of related sequences in all other plant species . Another example is the manually curated metabolic pathways in Ecocyc, MetaCyc and PlantCyc, which have been used to predict genome-scale metabolic networks for several species based on gene sequence similarity . The recently developed Plant Reactome database has further streamlined the process of orthology-based projections of plant pathways by creating simultaneous projections for 74 species. These projections are routinely updated along with the curated pathways from the Reactome reference species Oryza sativa . Without manual biocuration of experimental data from Arabidopsis, rice and other model organisms, the plant community would not have the powerful gene function prediction workflows we have today, nor would the development of the wide array of existing genomic resources and automated protocols have been possible. Biocurators continue to provide feedback to improve automated pipelines for prediction workflows and help to streamline data sets for their communities and/or add a value to the primary data.

All biocuration is time consuming and requires assistance from expert biologists. Current efforts in machine learning and automated text mining to pull data or to rank journal articles for curation more effectively work to some extent, but so far these approaches are not able to synthesize a clear narrative and thus cannot yet replace biocurators. The manual curation of literature, genes, proteins, pathways etc. by expert biologists remains the gold standard used for developing and testing text mining tools and other automated workflows. We expect that although text-mining tools will help biocurators achieve higher efficiency, biocurators will remain indispensable to ensure accuracy and relevance of biological data. GGB databases can increase researchers’ efficiency, increase the return on research funding investment by maximizing reuse and provide use metrics for those who desire to quantify research impact. We anticipate that the demand for biocurators will increase as the tsunami of ‘big data’ continues. Despite the fact that the actual cost of data curation is estimated to be less than 0.1% of the cost of the research that generated primary data , data curation remains underfunded .Databases are focused on serving the varied needs of their stakeholders. Because of this, different GGB databases may curate different data types or curate similar data types to varying depths, and are likely to be duplicating efforts to streamline curation. In addition, limited resources for most GGB databases often prevent timely curation of the rapidly growing data in publications.The size and the complexity of biological data resulting from recent technological advances require the data to be stored in computable or standardized form for efficient integration and retrieval. Use of ontologies to annotate data is important for integrating disparate data sets. Ontologies are structured, controlled vocabularies that represent specific knowledge domains . Examples include the GO for attributes of gene products such as subcellular localization, molecular function or biological role,flood and drain tray and Plant Ontology for plant attributes such as developmental stages or anatomical parts. When data are associated with appropriate ontology terms, data interoperability, retrieval and transfer are more effective. In this section, we review the challenges and opportunities in the use of ontologies and provide a set of recommendations for data curation with ontologies.To identify current status and challenges in ontology use, an online survey was offered to AgBioData members. The survey results for ontology use in databases for each data type are provided in Table 1 and a summary of other survey questions such as barriers to using ontologies are provided in the supplementary material 1. In addition, the ways ontologies are used in data descriptions in some GGB databases are described in supplementary material 2. To facilitate the adoption of ontologies by GGB databases, we describe the challenges identified by the survey along with some opportunities to meet these challenges, including a review of currently available ontologies for agriculture, ontology libraries and registries and tools for working with ontologies.

A key component of FAIR data principles is that data can be found, read and interpreted using computers. APIs and other mechanisms for providing machine-readable data allow researchers to discover data, facilitate the movement of data among different databases and analysis platforms and when coupled with good practices in curation, ontologies and metadata are fundamental to building a web of interconnected data covering the full scope of agricultural research. Without programmatic access to data, the goals laid out in the introduction to this paper cannot be reached because it is simply not possible to store all data in one place, nor is it feasible to work across a distributed environment without computerized support. After a brief description of the current state of data access technology across GGB databases and other online resources, we more fully describe the need for programmatic data access under Challenges and Opportunities and end with recommendations for best practices. Sharing among AgBioData databases is already widespread, either through programmatic access or other means. The results of the AgBioData survey of its members indicate that GGB databases and resources vary in how they acquire and serve their data, particularly to other databases. All but 3 out of 32 GGB databases share data with other databases, and all but two have imported data from other database. Some make use of platforms, such as Inter Mine , Ensembl and Tripal , to provide programmatic access to data that is standard within, but not across the different options. Other databases develop their own programmatic access or use methods such as file transfer protocol . Finally, some databases provide no programmatic access to data. A number of infrastructure projects already exist that support AgBioData data access needs, most of which have been adopted to some degree by different GGB platforms . A more recent approach to facilitate data search, access and exchange is to define a common API that is supported by multiple database platforms. An example of this is BrAPI , which defines querying methods and data exchange formats without requiring any specific database implementation. Each database is free to choose an existing implementation or to develop its own. However, BrAPI’s utility is restricted to specific types of data. Alternatively, the Agave API provides a set of services that can be used to access, analyse and manage any type of data from registered systems, but is not customized to work with GGB databases.Aside from primary repositories like GenBank, model organism and specialty databases remain the primary means of serving data to researchers, particularly for curated or otherwise processed data. These databases represent different community interests, funding sources and data types. They have grown in an ad hoc fashion and distribute data in multiple formats, which are often unique to each database and are may be without programmatic access. Below, we lay out some of the challenges and opportunities in programmatic data access faced by GGB researchers using the current landscape of databases. Exploration of these use cases yielded a set of common data access requirements under five different themes, summarized in Table 7.Large comparative genomic portals exist but have limitations in their utility for specialized communities, such as not incorporating data from minor crop species or crop wild relatives or rarely handling multiple genomes for the same species.